The Process Forum

The Process Forum (http://www.process-productions.com/forum/index.php)
-   Breast Expansion (http://www.process-productions.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science" (http://www.process-productions.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16408)

Matsu-sensei 08-19-2009 09:24 AM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sergio (Post 359753)
Hey guys, thanks a ton for the kind words, check the OP for a bonus animation featuring the artwork of our own Matsu-sensei!

Ahaha, oh... wow. I check up on this thread now and then because it's rare to find well done tween-BE, and was surprised when I looked at the list and read "matsu heavytan". XD

Awesome work! The firing and bouncing was perfect icing on the cake. :D

I need to feed her more Sandviches. :P

SoylentOrange 08-19-2009 10:21 AM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Great work, sergio, but I think the animation would have looked better if she was growing as she fired, nstead of waiting for all the growth to fniish before starting.

Sergio 08-19-2009 01:42 PM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SoylentOrange (Post 362166)
Great work, sergio, but I think the animation would have looked better if she was growing as she fired, nstead of waiting for all the growth to fniish before starting.

Oh yes, I agree entirely. That was the original plan actually, she would begin firing at flat and would notice more and more jiggle as the expansion occurred. In practice though, animating the growth, jiggle and two layers of fabric deforming all at once started becoming a headache, so I cheated a bit :o. When I get more time I may revisit this animation to add more details such as these and some facial reactions.

ragemachine123 08-19-2009 02:05 PM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sergio (Post 362229)
Oh yes, I agree entirely. That was the original plan actually, she would begin firing at flat and would notice more and more jiggle as the expansion occurred. In practice though, animating the growth, jiggle and two layers of fabric deforming all at once started becoming a headache, so I cheated a bit :o. When I get more time I may revisit this animation to add more details such as these and some facial reactions.

Now here's a thought. Why not add some milking into the animation when you do your re-visit?

Matsu-sensei 08-20-2009 08:52 AM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ragemachine123 (Post 362240)
Why not add some milking into the animation when you do your re-visit?

:/

malhavoc 08-20-2009 12:24 PM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Is it only me, or do the animations start out at Low Quality for everyone? I have to manually reset them to High Quality each time the animations loop. Needless to say it is a bit annoying. :/ Not a big issue or anything, but I wanted to check and see if it was the animations or if I was doing something wrong.

Matsu-sensei 08-20-2009 12:30 PM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by malhavoc (Post 362544)
Is it only me, or do the animations start out at Low Quality for everyone? I have to manually reset them to High Quality each time the animations loop. Needless to say it is a bit annoying. :/ Not a big issue or anything, but I wanted to check and see if it was the animations or if I was doing something wrong.

It's on purpose: the base drawings are drawn with the pixelated pencil tool, so leaving it on Low Quality makes the animated parts pixelated too, and blend in more. If you go High Quality, you see smooth vectored breasts pasted on top of a pixelated base image, so it looks off.

ragemachine123 08-20-2009 12:52 PM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Matsu-sensei (Post 362509)
:/

What? It is just an idea I was thowing out there.

Sergio 08-20-2009 02:33 PM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Matsu-sensei (Post 362546)
It's on purpose: the base drawings are drawn with the pixelated pencil tool, so leaving it on Low Quality makes the animated parts pixelated too, and blend in more. If you go High Quality, you see smooth vectored breasts pasted on top of a pixelated base image, so it looks off.

Yep, this. The first frame of the animation is coded to set the movie to low quality and disable scaling for stylistic reasons (I happen to dig pixels as well).

Matsu-sensei 08-20-2009 05:02 PM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ragemachine123 (Post 362550)
What? It is just an idea I was thowing out there.

Wouldn't fit in well.

malhavoc 08-20-2009 07:00 PM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Ah, I see. Curiosity sated.

SoylentOrange 09-25-2009 08:47 PM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
*cough*

Ryu_Knight 09-25-2009 09:43 PM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SoylentOrange (Post 385816)
Hey Sergio, if you'e still out there (or anyone else for that matter) feel up to animating this quick little sequence?

you know I just opened up all five of those mages in seperate window and clicked on each in order and it look like t would be a nice animation

SoylentOrange 09-25-2009 10:12 PM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Exactly why I asked. ^^;

I know it's not BE, but really, they line up perfectly and it's along the same principle- two large spheres outgrowing their clothes as the girl watches with excitement. :)

Sergio 09-25-2009 10:49 PM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by SoylentOrange (Post 385816)
Hey Sergio, if you'e still out there (or anyone else for that matter) feel up to animating this quick little sequence?

Normally not into this sort of process, but you've been giving encouraging feedback since day one, so I'll give you this one. Is the artwork yours? If so, nice job, if not be sure to let me know who to give credit to when I post the finished project.

Attached is a teaser, will work on this more after sleep.

SoylentOrange 09-25-2009 11:16 PM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Thanks sergio! :)

malhavoc 09-26-2009 10:05 AM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SoylentOrange (Post 385867)
The artwork is by Chuckles1982, but it's for Hmm!, since he's had a really nasty month and I requested it off Chuckles as some much-needed cheering up for the poor overworked sot.

I can sympathize with this on levels that boggle the mind. Pass on my well wishes for Hmm! would you? I know all too well what it is like to be in that boat. >_O

SoylentOrange 09-30-2009 09:43 PM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
Will do, thanks. I'm sure it'll mean a lot to him. :)

Surkis 12-09-2009 01:04 AM

Re: Animation Experiment based on Woot's "Super Science"
 
I'm annoyed i didn't stumble upon this thread sooner.

Good stuff :D


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.