![]() |
Atomizing
1 Attachment(s)
A friend of mine is quite the fanatic about shrink content, has to be said that his interest is rubbing off on me too. I know I don't usually post much but figured I'd at least share this sketch that I did for him.
It's very likely I'll be doing more Shrink sketches in the future, so what kind of situations/sizes do you think would be good to experiment with? The way I see it, any size can be fine, but as long as there's an element of interaction in one way or another. |
Re: Atomizing
i love it. Im also very much into extreme shrinking and there is no way being to small. As you said, interaction is possible at any size. Keep shrinking more and more...
|
Re: Atomizing
You must've gotten hot and bothered at the end of Marvel's Ant Man, then.
I don't understand shrinking without something being shrunk against. Once you get past a certain scale, it simply loses meaning. The trapping of society (clothes) getting bigger is one thing, but atoms? The two characters remain the same size so... what is actually happening in that piece? The "concept" of shrinking is the turn-on rather than the measurable consequences? |
Re: Atomizing
The 3-4 foot range is fun. At that size, you will still try to go out and live your life, so you have the best possibilities for interaction: Driving, walking through crowds, talking to people, ect. Below that you need a life-threatening reason to have your character leave the house.
|
Re: Atomizing
Quote:
Any ways, the process is the thing for me. So please please please have stages or shrinking spurts or a slow shrinkee. Please? |
Re: Atomizing
Never have been into that scale of shrinking. Mostly because at that size a person is clearly smaller than air molecules that they'd need to breathe...... so basically every pic like that needs a caption below it that reads
Three minutes later, they were all dead Same goes for outgrowing a planet to the point the subject is now floating in space. |
Re: Atomizing
Quote:
At the end of every movie, he says, "then the sun went nova and destroyed all life on earth." Hey, it's usually fantasy anyway. :P |
Re: Atomizing
I like midget sized (2-3 feet) and loose AF clothing w heels so is that a suggestion?
|
Re: Atomizing
For me, half the fun of a shrinking woman fantasy is interacting with the shrunken woman. The smaller she gets, the harder it is to interact in a way that doesn't involve crushing, which I loathe. And at this scale, interacting becomes impossible.
|
Re: Atomizing
But she can interact with things.
|
Re: Atomizing
.
|
Re: Atomizing
Quote:
|
Re: Atomizing
Quote:
|
Re: Atomizing
::Hugs::
|
Re: Atomizing
Thanks for the replies and input, people. Admittedly the size I originally posted is too minuscule for my tastes, it was more a case of just attempting something outside the usual drawing zone. But I say it was worth the effort at least.
I'll try out some of the suggested material sometime in the future, see how it pans out. |
Re: Atomizing
As an artist I find it hard to draw on a scale smaller than the world I interact with comfortably already. Objects give perspective to the reader. However the post that started this thread is done so well I can see doing atomized art and making it work too. I tend to draw most my SW's around eight to twelve inches tall. Doll sized. Though the situations I draw them in, or am asked to draw them in are hardly meant to convey safety. :D
|
Re: Atomizing
Quote:
Don't know how accurate it is though. |
Re: Atomizing
Quote:
|
Re: Atomizing
Quote:
|
Re: Atomizing
The atomic model in the drawing is also scientifically inaccurate, but, eh.
|
Re: Atomizing
|
Re: Atomizing
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.