New Smash Bros!
HYPE
But really, im really excited for the new one. Here is the link! I wont spoil it, check it out yourself! http://www.smashbros.com/us/ |
Re: New Smash Bros!
I really hope Lucas is still in the roster. He is a VERY unknown character though Nintendo-lore wise, so I'm doubting he'll make a comeback.
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Muh megaman
muh hype |
Re: New Smash Bros!
I honestly hope the Pokemon Trainer makes a return, and with different Pokemon to fight with.
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Looks like I'm going to pick up a new main.
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
C'mon, Nintendo, don't blow it this time...Krystal...Krystal...Krystal....
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
I main Lucas, Pikachu, and King Dee Dee Dee. I'm guessing KDDD is safe, and Pikachu clearly is, so that just leaves Lucas in doubt. I figure Ness is safe, but Ness is no Lucas.
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Last month Nintendo had a Mother event in Japan. They had billboards and television commercials to let people know they could buy Mother 2 on the WiiU now. They are also finally rereleasing Earthbound in the states.
I think Lucas is safe. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
Funny thing about Megaman being in Smash Brothers....
(be sure to look at the year this was published) https://imageshack.us/scaled/large/19/megakirby.jpg |
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
http://brawlinthefamily.keenspot.com...by-transforms/ I'm totally hyped for it. I'm going to constantly annoy my friends by calling him JUMP-'N-SHOOT MAN. I'm DEFINITELY trying him out the moment I get the game. I'm not too concerned about my mains. Not because I don't think they'll change, but because I'm sure they'll change a bit. I mean, back in Melee, I mained Sheik, Samus, and was starting to pick up Jiggles (who happens to get her own amazing change in 6th gen Pokemon, btw, but that's a different topic). When Brawl came around, that changed to (in order) Lucas, Pikachu, Pokemon Trainer, Ganondorf, Kirby, Mr.G&W. Practically all my friends (except this obnoxiously good Pit player) find them all insufferable. I got a really good understanding of the internal mechanics of the series and now I have an idea of how to find easily exploitable tricks once I get my hands on the release, but I highly doubt my mains will be the same. Villager's looking pretty viable as a pseudo-G&W, seeing how he casually plucked one of Samus's charge shots out of mid-air. I got really good good understanding of the internal mechanics of the series during Brawl. Much better than I got in Melee. I can only imagine what Smash Bros. 3DS (I ain't buying a Wii U unless extensive versus match configuration is in) would do for me. EDIT: Oh, and I'll just leave this here: https://vine.co/v/blhYwA5MeLh EDITEDIT: Scratch that, its already on the main site. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
Makes you wonder if this'll spur a Mega Man revival in some form or another. But then, that's up to Capcom, and they hate happiness.
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
All aboooooooooard the hype train~!
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
This makes me happy I bought a WiiU.
Who else here has one? We should start trying to get friend listed with one another for when this comes out ;P |
Re: New Smash Bros!
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
The Earthbound news however has me excited. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
What do you all think of people giving the Wii Fit Trainer crap? I mean, it's a character: be happy, right?
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
People are hating on Wii Fit Trainer? I think it's nice to see a female character in the series that's not a princess or Samus.
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
I will need to get a WiiU at some point so I can play this. I've love all the other games.
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
I enjoy random obscure characters showing up, makes it more fun than simply having mainstream ones. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
I'm curious as to how the 3DS version will differ from the Wii U one; aside from graphics, obviously.
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
1 Attachment(s)
Talk shit. Get fit.
<3 |
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
That's it. It was an unexpected surprise. The character video helped to convince me that, at the very least, she'll be an entertaining addition to the Smash cast. Also, some of the hilariously awesome fan-art helps. (Great work, amateur!) Speaking of unexpected additions, isn't Namco Bandai helping out with this game? |
Re: New Smash Bros!
If by help you mean Namco Bandai is co-developing the game, then yes they are.
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
I initially had my doubts as far as WFT goes, but as far as I'm concerned, it's a new "realistically proportioned" female Brawl character, so there's inevitably going to be BE of her eventually. I'm cool with this.
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
http://bluesteven.files.wordpress.co...romite_rob.jpg "Hello. I am R.O.B., the Robotic Operating Buddy. I am the single most useless peripheral Nintendo ever made. I only worked with two NES games; one which was never released, and another in which I could be replaced by a second controller. If you had to choose between erasing me or the Power Glove from existence, you might have to think long and hard about it, but you would choose me. And I got into Smash Bros. Brawl and Krystal didn't." Seriously, though, I don't hate R.O.B, I just thought Krystal should have been in Brawl too. I hope Nintendo doesn't let me down this time. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
Krystal is a terrible character with no redeeming features there I said it not I'm taking it back.
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
She was a slapped together character that was originally not part of the StarFox universe (Starfox Adventures was going to be a new IP and she was going to be the main character, but instead they slapped Starfox on the title and pushed her over to a supporting role). Let's face it...people like her because she is a fox with tits. Not much else going for her. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
I have no affiliation towards Krystal at all, but if they're looking to keep the same number of SF characters in the new one, I certainly wouldn't mind them dropping Wolf. I hate that character so much. Probably my least favorite Brawl character next to Wario, Jigglypuff and Olimar.
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
Falco remains the most prominent secondary Star Fox character, and has now appeared in two Smash games making his removal unlikely. Wolf, although is likely to be one the few characters is the "Danger Zone" with Ike, Toon Link, and Lucario, he still offers something more substantial and relevant to a franchise than female representation. That being villainous or adversarial representation. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
wow...this topic..i. play this game competitively and host hte major events for it O.o
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
I know it sounds willfully ignorant, or perhaps even "reverse-pretentious," but I really dislike the tournament mentality of the game. No items, ~3 allowed stages, 90% of the players play on the "top 3" characters...
http://i4.ytimg.com/vi/wnRIE8G3UQI/hqdefault.jpg ^^^ That isn't a fun game to me. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
That is a big misconception.
Items are removed to avoid randomness..i'll explain when home. Best thing about smash (IMO) Is that there are dozens of ways to play. BTW it's not 3 stages allowed it's a bit more than that. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
The smash bros competitive community is a joke. Full of boring people who use the most slimy tactics to win.
Just like competitive pokemon play. A bunch of people who use the same 6 pokemon. Cause screw using your favorites, in a game with over 600 characters... |
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
They usually use Fox...since he is "Top Tier" Me? I pick something like Mario or Jigglypuff... (Medium tier characters) and when I kick their ass I remind them that: Tiers are for queers. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
I stopped playing Super Smash Bros. Brawl online because every single damn level played online was Final Friggin' Destination, and half the time I'd see Fox or Meta Knight.
I like variety, thanks. That's why I play as a variety of characters (as in anyone but the Star Fox trio, Marth, or Meta Knight). |
Re: New Smash Bros!
wow you guys are really wrong on a lot of it. I will show u when i get home :)
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
Best 3 out of 5 Medium drop of items, all on(unless some are specifically agreed on to be excluded) Random stages And most importantly, randomized character. I want to see these "pro" players do as well playing Ganondorf as they do with Metaknight or Marth. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Well, try not to be going down the opposite path, guys. You may not find their method of play fun, but they tend not to find yours fun either. No one person's way of playing is the right one.
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
It makes sense, though. For tourneys, it's usually a good idea to limit random outcomes as much as possible. However, I'd still like to see "no favorites / enforced character randoms" to both increase originality and encourage tactical variations. I don't see any variation where "crouch and spam grenades" is a valid tournament strategy. Try that shit with Ike and just see what happens. :p
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
At the same time I realize that the misconceptions are there. People do not use slimy tactics. They use strategies. There is a huge difference in how ANY game is played competitively (for seriouslies) vs. casually ( for funsies). I think IMO that is what makes smash stand out from any other game. We can have something like this where you can have items and you cannot. It is a great thing. Quote:
64 : Fox is a High tier ( Best 2 characters are Kirby / Pikachu ) Melee : Fox is a Top tier ( has bad match-ups vs Marth/Puff ( Who is actually top tier )/Falco/Sheik) Fox also can do bad vs mid tiers like Pikachu and C.Falcon, Mario, Doc, etc. Brawl : Fox is mid tier. He has bad matches with MK ( top tier ) , Ice climbers, Olimar, Marth, Falco, GnW (IMO ), and DDD if I remember correctly. Remember in any game play who you want. No one is telling you different. Our community THRIVES on character loyalty. Just understand that they might not have the tools to win a match items/no items. Quote:
We use several stages which include: Final Destination Smashville Lylat Battlefield Yoshi Island Frigate Halbred Castle Seige Delphino That is just off the top fo my head. TBH FD is a stage that is "neutral" in people's eyes ( tbh though battlefield imo is the best stage ). Quote:
2 out of 3 no items some stages are banned and some are legal. You can pick character Those are the rules we play by. This is because - 3/5 takes too long. Average time for a match is 5-6 mins for any version of smash. - Items are , based on the frame data and a lot of factors, "random". This basically means that it does not test the skill of the player but is considered just a chance. There are HOWEVER Item legal events as side events that people enter. Those are fun. But that is our logic. We want the PLAYER to win not the item or stage or whatever is not the two players. - Forcing players to pick random is a side event we also do. In major events ( Apex 2012 and Apex 2013 for brawl had 1000+ people ) it would not be fair to force others to roll the dice (which is something i mention just above here) Go to my thread where I list links to my events and youtube matches. You will find that we are a great community and we actually have a great time. Apex 2013 winners were 64 - Japanese player that uses Kirby Melee - Swedish player that uses Peach Brawl - NJ player that uses ZERO Suit Samus. :) Thanks for listening. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
I did not say it wasn't. I feel any time you force someone do to something is unfair.
Like I said there are players that use every character. But , face facts, some characters are not that great. It takes a lot more skill and some people do not have it. Brawl, for example, in Japan Peach is placing top 3 which is unheard of. BTW - Olimar is also a great character. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
Okay, fair enough; I just feel forced randoms serve to level the playing field.
There is, however, another way to balance the results: add a Special bonus to the in-game score. It can be positive or negative, depending on variety and complexity of attacks. That way, some backstab-spamming jackass can actually place behind someone who took the time to learn their character. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
the ingame score is called stocks lol.
I think you are looking at this wrong. So ya :/. In the sense of competitive play a majority of ppl play characters they like. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
Skill > character choice by far. Also, unrelated, but the game has been announced for three and a half weeks and I've yet to see anything processy of the Wii Fit Trainer. Either I haven't looked hard enough or I am disappoint. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
i did say a mid tier won the last championship didnt i? lol
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
in the game f you do the same move over and over it stales and leaves u unable to use it effectively .
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
I am a firm believer that tiers are not the end all be all and any character is more than capable of winning. Period. What matters is the person playing. I only go to the Jigglypuff when I want to be REALLY annoying (It's fun doing a 4 player FFA and making the 3 others have to gang up on you because you keep using sleep whenever they all get clustered together, killing all 3 multiple times XD). And when I talk balance, assume I'm talking about Melee. Brawl just didn't cut it for me competitively....random tripping...SERIOUSLY?! And I know that Metaknight was considered too OP and has been banned from the big name tourneys, heh. |
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
|
Re: New Smash Bros!
Forgot to mention, I also use Samus.
And you bet your ass I'll be using the super extended grapple hook against you :) (drawback: You have to manually press the button a second time to succeed in the actual grapple, otherwise it goes through the person) |
Re: New Smash Bros!
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.