Quote:
Originally Posted by danielsangeo
Personally, I don't like stereograms because they only work if you concentrate and you don't get color. It's 3D, yes, but the entire object is in the same texture as the stereogram, so using it for things like humans (or similar) might not be the best idea.
Of course, that's my opinion. :-)
|
I think you're confused with the 3D posters with the ugly textures that they'd sell in the 90s. (like in the movie Mallrats.. its a sailboat!)
I believe Xil is talking about stereoscopic images like the one I'm attaching below.
2 normal photographs side-by-side, each with a slightly different angle. When you cross your eyes, a 3rd image appears between the two, and is in perfect 3D! The effect is pretty damned good.
This image is from
http://www.stereoscopy.com/gallery/index.html , They've got quite a few images there, check em out.
I always seem to get better results from the "parallel viewing" images than the cross-eye there. The cross-eye images there always give me a bit of shimmering, but the parallel are always rock solid for me. But maybe that's just me.