Re: new philosophical thread by jake, hated and feared scourge of the board... *sigh*
Okay, so the point of this was to show us some nifty animated optical illusion and try to give us a headache with bullshit about how shadows have no depth? Well of course they have no depth, because light has no mass (discussed in an earlier thread) therefore shadows can't have mass either. All a shadow is is a spot where light isn't as present as the area around it due to it being blocked by an object. No mass, no substance, no depth. Making the entire concept of a 3D shadow.. retarded. That 4D object animation, is only 2D, using optical illusions to attempt to represent a moving 3D object, but even the most complex of 3D objects are still only 3D whether you put another object inside it or not it does not create a 4th spatial dimension.
Mathematics that "prove" the existence of higher dimensions are only mathematical theories, in that they can only be "proven" within the field of mathematics. Sure because 2+2=4 and so on.. it must be true that there's a 4th spatial dimension? No, that= bullshit unless and until it's existence can be proven outside a chalkboard drawing or computer simulation.
Next you'll be telling us that the quantum theory of infinite worlds is "proven" by math, even though no one has ever actually observed another quantum instance of reality in which the cat in the box was actually both alive and dead at the same time.
Last edited by TF-Viewer; 05-17-2008 at 09:43 AM.
|