[Lord T Hawkeye]

Originally Posted by Hooded_Miracle

I've noticed that in the last few elections, it's either you vote for one mistake or the other.

I like America, but I plan on voting for Chuck Norris until I see a side with a candidate that doesn't have any glaring flaws. ('_')/

In practical terms, if you don't like any of the candidates, go to the voting booth and turn in a blank voting ballot. This will make your statement clear. (if you don't vote at all, they'll just dismiss you as being too lazy to bother.)

It's a good thing that my argument remains that the rule of law is not subject to whims, but rather it establishes a system to explain the its own meaning should all other means fail or find conflict, courts. To deny that is to deny the functionality of constitutional law.

I'll say again, the constitution is intended to restrict courts as much as all the other branches. How can it do that if the courts get to say what it means?

You still continue to evade the bigger point, how do you straight faced deny all the blatant violations of the constitution are in fact violations? Truth is not democratic, just because some people say they aren't violations doesn't make it so.