Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel Bronwyn
Qzar is still taking the logic-free route of claiming "I never said that, so you're a big liar-liar-pants-on-fire" which, frankly, is just inflated semantics. If you honestly think not saying exact words equates to having not said or suggested as much, you're delusional. But that's old news. If someone honestly believes "I didn't name-call or use swear words, therefore, I wasn't insulting and I win", frankly, I applaud them. That level of irrational thinking might do my mental health some good (and make me a total dick.) Sadly, I'm a prisoner of logic and reason.
|
Who's talking exact words? I never said anything
even remotely like it. Honestly. What's the matter with you? Your argument goes something like this: "Dude" finds a woman attractive, then finds out she's a TG and used to be a he, and no longer finds her attractive, and that is therefore homophobia. The fact that I disagree with you there aside, you're accusing me of it when
I have not said that I'm unattracted to Eve or any other TG person. At all, in any way, shape, form, or fashion. I therefore do not meet the criteria for your assertion. If either of us is delusional, well, it ain't me.
TL: DR version: It's not arguing semantics, because I haven't even said anything that
suggests I find a TG female unattractive. So, in your own words, yes, you are a "big liar-liar-pants-on-fire." If I'm wrong, then I ask for the Nth time that you show me where I even implied it.
By the way, thanks for continuing to support my statements about maturity (e.g. the insults) which have nothing to do with whether or not I "win" this thread. I was just pointing out that it's possible to disagree with someone and still have some civility, but you and Warlock don't seem capable of that.
On an entirely unrelated note: LOD, that actually is a pretty hot photo of Eve, there. I didn't like the Zoo one, to me it's not flattering to her face. Of course lacy black lingerie helps.