Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord T Hawkeye
Constructive criticism is what I did. I stated specifically what I was unsatisfied about the comic and did not at any point make personal attacks.
You on the other hand, in a grand display of projection, called me a whiner and deemed me unqualified to hold an opinion about said comic on the basis that I have not published a book or comic of my own.
If you can't understand why that's a legendarily flawed argument, let me present you with a parallel.
If you said that Batman and Robin was a terrible movie and someone came back with "Well you're not a director so what do you know?", what would your reaction be? Once you stopped laughing that is.
Protip: Don't use arguments that you yourself would not accept.
|
Sure but you don't say how you didn't like Batman and Robin at the Return of the King movie theater (when the Batman and Robin movie theater was across the street). If you're going to critique Batman and Robin, do it someplace more appropriate or at the very least sound less bitchy so everyone around you won't want to stap their ears with nails. I mean post your critique over there so you MIGHT do something than preach to the choir over here where nobody really cares.
Quote:
Never said that. Action is just as capable of overstaying it's welcome but nobody said anything about endless fight scenes or anything now did they?
Polarizing is not an argument either.
|
And I never said you said that. I was merely pointing out how you said there was a lack of action and using the example that having more action doesn't necessarily make a better story.
Quote:
|
Nirvanna fallacy. Try again
|
Wait wha-? How the hell is it the nirvana fallacy if I'm using sarcasm. It's like calling a mirage unrealistic. No shit it's unrealistic, IT'S NOT REAL!!