My apologies for not providing feedback sooner, Gary, as I was rabidly awaiting a new SW clip from you. (I suffered a minor computer-related meltdown and had ... difficulties ... for the past few days.)
Short response: Thank you sir, may I have another?
Long response:
I really enjoyed this one. I like that you took one of our suggestions and had her shrink, fashion an outfit, then shrink AGAIN right out of that one. Perhaps a bit more time could be spent on the second shrink-out in the future, but it was nice to have it at all. ...For that matter, maybe do it three times, as you've done sometimes with growth clips in the past. Either she shrinks, grows back, and shrinks again, or shrinks, fashions something to wear, shrinks out of that, covers up with something else, then shrinks out of THAT. But I'm not greedy.
I also liked the shot from behind with the too-large panties hanging off her rear. More shots like that at different stages of shrinking would be cool.

Ah, and speaking of lovely imagery, I like the semi-toplessness, and her just standing there covering herself after the second shrink (as opposed to the usual "poke head out from under panties, next scene dressed" that we get sometimes).
The handheld thing at the end worked pretty well, but there was a bit where the pink harness was visible. I also noticed one or two other minor green-screen errors (one shot with her shoes sticks out in my mind). Also, her fallen clothes vanished instead of piling up at her feet. These are nitpicks, though; nothing that would keep me from buying another clip. One other minor nitpick: there still is some scale inconsistency with the clothes, particularly the lingerie.
I liked Natalie. She's easy on the eyes, and her acting wasn't bad either. And I always like it when the shrinkee actually *mentions* "shrinking," "getting smaller," etc. So, wouldn't mind seeing her again. Now if only you'll do that sleep-study/body lotion scenario that's been suggested on here...

Hey, and when can we get another clip with two chicks shrinking?