Quote:
Originally Posted by vincent_richter
If the pieces were individually commissioned
|
You based your whole argument on that one point. You've made a series of huge assumptions. You assume they were individually commissioned, you assume he's committed fraud, you also assume that the letter of the law regarding fraud is the same everywhere. You aren't even considering the difference in state laws in conjunction with federal law. Contract law is not universal, it can vary from place to place and that has to be taken into account when transactions take place across state lines or between people residing in different countries.
So really.. assumption assumption assumption on your part mixed in with a fair amount of anger (unless I'm misreading the shouting portions) that's probably misdirected. I'll remind you that you
do not know
any of the details surrounding this situation aside from the fact that the commission was paid for and not completed. You've made gigantic assumptions based on limited information that portrays events in a way that makes things appear far worse than they may actually be.
He may be dead. He may have suffered injuries to his drawing hand. There are countless possible reasons why this happened, yet you admittedly assume foul play without evidence to support that. That's not cool. Give him the benefit of the doubt until you have an actual credible bit of information that supports your claim of fraud.