Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironhorse
Dodge isn't known for their long term quality, and 2007 is within the time where they suffered from the bailout and sale to Fiat. My experience with the 1996-2002 models was that while they have the best features, but the long term quality was very poor.
Chrysler in general has had poor ratings vs. GM, Ford, Toyota and Honda in initial and long term quality. As you get more recent the gap widens.
Of course, where you live makes a big difference. Up north the salt and winter eats cars while the pot holes slam them to death. If you or the vehicle are primarily in the south US it should last a lot longer. Just watch out for that bacteria that eats evap cases on the east coast.
|
And here I expected you'd recommend I buy a train.
I do live in sunny South Carolina, so I doubt salt and ice will be TOO much of a problem. Hopefully.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prof_Sai
|
........dafuq? O_o That's certainly an interesting look, but I think if I'm gonna have something with three wheels I'd prefer
this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keile
I used to have a Ford...never...again. It lived up to it's name (Fix Or Repair Daily/Found On Road Dead), traded it in and got a Toyota Tacoma. Never regretted it a single day. I would take another Toyota over another Ford any day now.
|
See, now, I had a Ford and it ran fine for several years, its only problem being a broken AC hose. I also had a Suzuki, which was *starting* to fall apart when I traded it in, then the Kia that recently hit a deer and died of her injuries a few days later. I've had good luck with cars so far.