Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamtales
There are only a few images with specific growth, but they do include one multi-image page. Most cartoons show thew women already grown.
|
No offense to you, DT, because this has been my point of view for a long time. Probably back during the early days of this aptly named Forum. I get there are dozens of different facets of this fetish genre. I do respect them and try to give them their space.
But between here and GTSCity Forum, how many times over the years have I kept seeing content flagged (if at all) as "Giantess" but most of the time it involves no Growth Process. Women already grown to whichever size and labeled as giantess category is not incorrect. Maybe I've just grown (no pun intended) accustomed to hope for or assume "giantess" content may contain process growth, which is no one's fault but my own. It would be helpful if some indication is given for whether the content does or does not contain growth process. GTSCity is supposed to have content flagged but often times it is not. So it all boils down to who cares probably. I just remember Lorekeep's hope when he started this Forum that the process of these transformations be exemplified in what was shared if possible.
However, and yes I'm going off the reservation for this opinion, normal sized women with a guy or girl being shrunk should NoT be referred to as "Giantess" content. If the size of the target woman or women does not get bigger by actual height, in my humble opinion that should not be considered giantess just because the people who get shrunk perceive them as giantess sized.
Give my regards to Bojay, if you would DT. I still admire his artwork but if this comic doesn't contain enough growth process I'll have to pass.