|
10-30-2009
|
#1 |
|
True Ronin
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 19
|
Future Women
|
|
|
|
10-30-2009
|
#2 |
|
Spell I bought is work'n
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,095
|
Re: Future Women
I have been to Framingham Mass and seen the women.
Fear the future. |
|
|
|
|
11-06-2009
|
#3 |
|
FLAME Magnet!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,851
|
Re: Future Women
Funny. They didn't prove it was any biological difference. It's mostly poor women who are short, plump, and reproduce alot.
Or, so I see around these parts at any rate.
__________________
Name:'Eviscerator' D.O.B: 1985 Age: 22 Gender: Male Occupation: Evil Minion of Wal-Mart Species: Homo Sapiens Sapiens Alignment: Neutral Listening To: Judas Priest - Burn in Hell |
|
|
|
|
11-06-2009
|
#4 |
|
Come into my parlour...
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,239
|
Re: Future Women
Hmm. Interesting article and interesting point raised by Eviscerator.
__________________
 |
|
|
|
|
11-06-2009
|
#5 |
|
Tieing a Knot Or two
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Breaking Down The Walls Of Your Imagination.
Posts: 19,660
|
Re: Future Women
Well I remember an article a while back that said women were getting taller and taller and eventually they would surpass men in height becoming the dominant sex!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
11-06-2009
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
|
Re: Future Women
The amount of babies someone has doesn't necessarily reflect their reproductive capabilities. What if they used birth control? What if they produced lots of sickly children?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
