![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Process Fan
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 84
|
![]()
There's a thread on General Discussion about the suggested idea of merging the AR/AP Section with the SW and/or GTS sections, due to AR/AP having a lack of updates and/or interest. I suggest that we keep this section open by trying to find new AR/AP material or at least submit our own.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Stupid computer problems
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 194
|
Re: Save our AR/AP Section
Why dont we merge everything into Transformation since everything is just a branch of bodies transforming anyway.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Process Fan
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 66
|
Re: Save our AR/AP Section
Isn't it just one guy spouting off because he's not seeing the content he wants?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Slave to the Process Forum
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,781
|
Re: Save our AR/AP Section
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Didn't write Ravenlations
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 23
|
Re: Save our AR/AP Section
The amount of content may wax and wane often, but AR/AP is a popular process regardless. The chance that it'll go away is very small, so don't let the trolls/ragers/whiney-men get to you.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
DO THE IMPOSSIBLE
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Spain
Posts: 872
|
Re: Save our AR/AP Section
Fmg has more content than ar/ag. (count the pages of topics)
Why doesnt it have its own proper category? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Just a wanderer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,073
|
Re: Save our AR/AP Section
The biggest issue isn't just about AP/AR, it's actually of people doing things for the Forum. It's a fact that not a lot of people actually find things, let alone make them, for the people here. Usually, if you want to get something, you either have to wait an eternity in hopes for your request to come up, pay up commissions for works, or just do them yourself.
Also, the issue isn't just about the works, but also the quantity of old works. People always want more and scoff when someone brings up something that looks new to them, but might be old to the Forum. That doesn't really give people the feel they should keep looking for more. Plus, when someone decides to take requests, either they don't end up getting any because their artwork isn't of the best quality, or they end up flooded to the point that they have to forcefully shut down the request line because they can't do them all, or end up feeling rushed because of it. I'm talking generally-speaking, but also of my own experience. So instead of groaning over why that part of the Forum should change, try and actually come up with pictures, sequences and stories to actually fill it up. *sigh* Okay, enough ranting. Time for me to go back to writing my story.
__________________
Follow my ongoing story, 'Upon a Star', on DeviantArt: http://medierth.deviantart.com/ "In this egotistic world in which we live in, it is sometimes to wonder if we shouldn't be like mirrors for others to deem us worthy to be looked at." - 'Le Chat' |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Tiny Lesbian Cat approves
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Still moving forward.
Posts: 15,969
|
Re: Save our AR/AP Section
There's no need to worry. The thread in the other section is nothing but all of us talking about how silly it is that someone wants to merge ar/ap into Sw/Gts.
__________________
Quote:
...broken hopes that bind your wounds... ..........................there is a purpose to this darkness __________________________________________________ Can you believe in this? |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Modest Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,998
|
Re: Save our AR/AP Section
Uh, try again.
I wanted to merge them elsewhere. Not close them down. That way they could get more exposure and maybe get people that wouldn't ordinarily see them interested again. Is reading comprehension something that is lacking around here or what?
__________________
Meh. Cranky and old. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Slow Transformer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 163
|
Re: Save our AR/AP Section
I suppose I could work on my drawing, but it'll be a few days before I'll have anything worth submitting.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Tiny Lesbian Cat approves
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Still moving forward.
Posts: 15,969
|
Re: Save our AR/AP Section
V, merging them elsewhere would only clog up SW/GTS with stuff that a lot of SW/GTS fans dont like. They're for the most part, entirely different fetishes. There's no need to merge them away. Besides, merging them would make content of all sides harder to find, not easier. Age fans would have ot dig through Size threads, and Size fans would have to dig through Age threads, and the obvious solution to that would be to apply tags at the head of each thread title, but then why not jsut separate them and make all content easier to find?
This is why we have separate sections to begin with.
__________________
Quote:
...broken hopes that bind your wounds... ..........................there is a purpose to this darkness __________________________________________________ Can you believe in this? |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
A Leecher Who Likes Tea
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 9
|
Re: Save our AR/AP Section
If something is going to move its the Body Expansion forum, look at their numbers compared to AR/AP, just abysmal. I love WG, but that forum is a ghost town compared to the AR/AP forums.
Unless this AR/AP community wants the merger, may not be the best decision to move it. I suggest the ol'democracy style. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|