Minors in TF Stories

[DollyBonnie]

So I stumbled upon this TF story:

"The Stuffed Donkey Enchantment"

http://src4387.deviantart.com/art/Th...ment-529369030

And it has a pretty detailed and semi-graphic transformation of a minor (age 9). It rightly contains no sexual content involving the minor character, but this is the first TF-story that I've encountered where one the victims is someone under 15 or 16.

Is this common? Do folks usually shun this type of stuff?

Seriously confused.

[whyamihere]

Yes and no, pure pedophilia is hated but when mixed with other fetishes its just frowned upon more than the normal fetish itself. Legally as long as no real children where apart of it its legal. Which is why weird fanfics and boku no pico exist

[Amahain]

This is a forum that caters to a sexual fetish. Even if the material is G-rated, anything that gets posted here is posted with the understanding that someone, somewhere, is turned on by the subject matter.

So with that in mind, I'm really uncomfortable with anything involving minors being posted here.

[DollyBonnie]

Originally Posted by Amahain

So with that in mind, I'm really uncomfortable with anything involving minors being posted here.

I didn't mean to make you uncomfortable. I just shared it as an example of something I found and was curious about.

[Amahain]

Don't worry, I understood the intention. I was trying to answer your question: "do folks shun this type of stuff". On this forum, I would hope the answer is "yes", but that's because this forum tends to sexualize transformations. On a site where TFs aren't sexualized, it might not be as much of a problem.

[Crash Ichimonji]

Oddly, though, some established characters who are minors in their series's canon aren't as frowned upon such as the main 14yr old pilots in Evangelion or any of the teen girls in Naruto (to name a few). Kinda a grey area there.

[RayO_ElGatubelo]

I actually love lolicon in TFs, and always like to seek it out. Bonus if it's AR or AP (an adult changing into a minor and an animal or a minor changing into an adult).

And yes, also if there's sexual stuff.

[Dr. Otto]

Anything that dances along the edge of pedophilia is extremely dangerous. The content of a story or illustration that so much as hints towards this kind of world should be approached with the utmost care and caution.

When it comes to drawn art, I don't personally feel any ethical line is crossed; no actual children were forced to be involved. Flat-out child pornography, on the other hand, really DOES cross the line, and justifies severe consequences, including jail-time.

That being said, this is a fetish-orientated site (although I've never been too comfortable about the word "fetish" myself; sometimes it's a teensy bit more complicated than that). The boundaries of good and bad taste can easily blur. But it's also aware of what's morally acceptable, and that's something I've always appreciated about it.

[kattphive]

Originally Posted by Dr. Otto

When it comes to drawn art, I don't personally feel any ethical line is crossed; no actual children were forced to be involved.

not that I'm promoting or defending anybody, but what about photomanips of clearly underage girls?

There are a couple or artists who draw some underage girls TFing and as much as I'm a little upset with myself for liking the images, so still do.
But then I see some other artists who do photomanips of underage girls, even though they are completely clothed, I still tend to shy away from their work

[Dr. Otto]

Originally Posted by kattphive

not that I'm promoting or defending anybody, but what about photomanips of clearly underage girls?

There are a couple or artists who draw some underage girls TFing and as much as I'm a little upset with myself for liking the images, so still do.
But then I see some other artists who do photomanips of underage girls, even though they are completely clothed, I still tend to shy away from their work

That's crossing the line, without question. If I had a daughter whose image was photomanipulated by some skeevy freak into a piece of porn, I'd want him dead. Basically, it's taking a photograph of a real child and voluntarily perverting the context behind the photo into something immoral. Trolls do this sort of thing all the time; not so much to get turned on by it themselves (although most of them probably do), but to provoke a rise out of other people.

[Wolf9Guard]

Originally Posted by Dr. Otto

That's crossing the line, without question. If I had a daughter whose image was photomanipulated by some skeevy freak into a piece of porn, I'd want him dead. Basically, it's taking a photograph of a real child and voluntarily perverting the context behind the photo into something immoral. Trolls do this sort of thing all the time; not so much to get turned on by it themselves (although most of them probably do), but to provoke a rise out of other people.

The sad thing though this day there are adults who fake the whole underage look (a very sad loop hole in the law) to appear to be under age and because they are technically legal age they can produce the whole 'teen' porn thing or younger. It will be a while before the laws catch up to eliminate the loophole entirely.

[RayO_ElGatubelo]

Also, what about TFs that feature adults turning into minors? Like a girl being age regressed into an anthro wolf pup?

I tend to like those and have commissioned a fair bit of ones myself. Don't see nearly enough of those.