atomic betty ap

[12345td123]

i found a awesome atomic betty pic by a pretty good dev. here's the link

http://kimtheartist.deviantart.com/

[Sutibaru]

Well the artist tried... kinda. Another tracer.

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/42656665/

[12345td123]

nice pic

[Captain Ash]

Nice pics, but isn't it just BE?

Captain Ash

[Janus Steel]

Man I love Philip's work... He's got a nice Transformation, I'm kinda surprised I've not seen it up... course it involves transformation and growing into a macro furry... so I'm not sure which form it would go in to begin with...

[Miracle overloading]

*sigh*
there's at least 3 more pics that are VERY obviously traced from Phillip's work.
Jeezus Christ this is ticking me off.
she could at least acknowledge were she got the pose/traced it from.
*sighs again*

[Indigo]

Originally Posted by Miracle overloading

*sigh*
there's at least 3 more pics that are VERY obviously traced from Phillip's work.
Jeezus Christ this is ticking me off.
she could at least acknowledge were she got the pose/traced it from.
*sighs again*

Hehe... but isn't it so much FUN to leave an anonymous comment on those pictures saying how nice a trace job they are and pointing to the source, then watching as the 'artist' frantically removes the picture?

Yes, I know I'm evil, but this sort of thing deserves a bit of evil.

Age changing in that sort of futuristic setting is interesting. It's more believable due to the space police's higher technology even if Betty herself's from modern earth.

[PrBlahBlahtson]

*proposes an 'Every time some (l)user traces and claims it as their own...' thread*

[PrBlahBlahtson]

Until they report your anonymous account for the accusation and get you banned and the comment deleted. Which is hypocracy at its best.

[Indigo]

Touche

Sorry, it's just that stealing someone's artwork and claiming it as your own is a big pet peeve of mine. People should know better than to do stupid crap like that.
...
Of course... these are humans we're talking about. Common sense is incredibly uncommon.

[PrBlahBlahtson]

Originally Posted by Indigo

Of course... these are humans we're talking about. Common sense is incredibly uncommon.

No, thinking is, particularly among the latest generation of teens. Case in point?
http://digg.com/tech_news/DMCA_Taked..._For_a_Fake_ID
For those unfamiliar with the laws surrounding drinking and IDs in the United States, it's illegal to serve or sell alcohol to anyone under the age of 21. The only work-around for this is that you can legally be GIVEN alcohol or cigarettes by your parents after the age of 16 (I think, might be 13).

It's also not exactly a minor crime to knowingly use a fake ID for anything, period.

And for those that can't puzzle it out, the spoiler for this story is below. Highlight to read.
The DMCA notice is for her picture and signature on the fake ID, which she claims are copyrighted. This is funny for two reasons. It's a derivative work of a government ID, so it's not copyrightable, and by admitting that she produced the picture and signature, she's admiting she produced the fake ID as well.