Giantess Zone Growth & Info Thread

Bozo · 03-08-2009

Gary, I had an idea for the foot/shoe stuff, and if Bud is watching this goes for them too.

Forgive me if I botch the technical terms here, but I hope you understand what I'm going to try to get at.
Okay, so the whole time you've been doing one shoe/one frame. Instead of that, try getting BOTH shoes in the same frame. If that's thw wrong term, I mean both shoes on the screen at the same time. But they don't both break at the same time. One breaks, then after one beat of rest the other one goes without a cut away. You lose the advantage of being able to zoom in really close but I think having some leg in there, a necessity for this kind of shot, adds a different appeal.
I know you do one at a time for reasons of ease, convenience, and getting the shot right but I think it would be a much nicer effect if you tried to do this and succeeded. After all, the fewer the times you cut away, the more realistic it is right?

Also along the lines of "not cutting away," what about mutiple apparel rips with a slow pan taking the place of a cut away? For example, you're centered on the shirt as the buttons pop off, they finish, then you slowly pan down for a couple of beats without anything hapening until you get to, say, the pants where rips form at the thighs towards the end of the camera pan, the camera stops moving, but the rips continue.

I think the common theme in both these ideas is that you've got a piece of action happening (a "rip") followed by a pause followed by another piece of action all while the camera is not cutting away.

Again, I can imagine it would add some time and difficulty to shooting but it may skim some off of editing.

03-08-2009	#11
Bozo Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: NYC, NJ Posts: 2,266	Re: Giantess Zone Growth & Info Thread Gary, I had an idea for the foot/shoe stuff, and if Bud is watching this goes for them too. Forgive me if I botch the technical terms here, but I hope you understand what I'm going to try to get at. Okay, so the whole time you've been doing one shoe/one frame. Instead of that, try getting BOTH shoes in the same frame. If that's thw wrong term, I mean both shoes on the screen at the same time. But they don't both break at the same time. One breaks, then after one beat of rest the other one goes without a cut away. You lose the advantage of being able to zoom in really close but I think having some leg in there, a necessity for this kind of shot, adds a different appeal. I know you do one at a time for reasons of ease, convenience, and getting the shot right but I think it would be a much nicer effect if you tried to do this and succeeded. After all, the fewer the times you cut away, the more realistic it is right? Also along the lines of "not cutting away," what about mutiple apparel rips with a slow pan taking the place of a cut away? For example, you're centered on the shirt as the buttons pop off, they finish, then you slowly pan down for a couple of beats without anything hapening until you get to, say, the pants where rips form at the thighs towards the end of the camera pan, the camera stops moving, but the rips continue. I think the common theme in both these ideas is that you've got a piece of action happening (a "rip") followed by a pause followed by another piece of action all while the camera is not cutting away. Again, I can imagine it would add some time and difficulty to shooting but it may skim some off of editing. __________________ Real niggas do real thangs. Last edited by Bozo; 03-08-2009 at 03:25 PM.