New Arania sequence TG/TF/BE/SW (Offsite)

[Sephie]

Originally Posted by frice2000

Whee! Screw learning about new content let's lambast posters and create controversy at every turn. No idea why I even read through this forum anymore.

because interpersonal conflict is more fun than your own internal conflict?

[John Colburn]

Originally Posted by Vengeance1701

How about trying tact and civility? It goes so much further than grousing and telling us how YOU PERSONALLY WON'T LOOK AT HER UGLY SITE AGAIN!

I mean, honestly, how would YOU respond to you?

Who knows, maybe it keeps her web costs low. Maybe....we don't know, how about you address your concerns to her in a respectful manner? You'd be amazed at how much further that'll get you.

I would respond to myself the way I respond to most things: In a straightforward and logical manner.

I didn't use any coarse language, nor did I say the site was ugly. The worst criticism I can give myself is that I was blunt. I could have used a more positive tone, but then again my feelings weren't positive and I wasn't speaking to the creator of the site. I didn't feel any specific need to be diplomatic, so I defaulted to honest.

My first post pointed out the problem I have with the site (thirty separate tabs to view the sequence mentioned in the OP) and a solution (edit them together into one image, or at least fewer than 30). My second post clarified that I respect the amount of work Arania does but it seems like the site doesn't get much work. You say I don't have tact or respect, but "needs work" is about as tactful as it gets if I'm trying to be honest about my opinion of the site.

As far as more specific concerns go, I don't see much point in elaborating since, as I mentioned, I'm not talking to the one responsible. I'm just reacting to a link posted on a forum. I'm pretty sure giving my honest opinion of the link is fair game, even if that opinion is not "OMG, that's great!".

[Vengeance1701]

Never mind, though, obviously my idea of tact towards a creator of content and yours will never meet and that's fine. I'm learning my ideas are obviously grossly outdated.

[KKM]

This is the most contentious collection of cantankerous concupiscents I could ever conceive of. Frankly, I feel fetishes are far from furthering this sort of sordid squabbling. It's unseemly.

[Vengeance1701]

Cool.

Alliteration.

[Sephie]

Originally Posted by Vengeance1701

Cool.

Alliteration.

God damn you taking advantage of a power surge to ninja me in that comment.

[dedodede]

Just change the URL (art01.jpg, art02.jpg, etc.), that's what I do.

[qzar9999]

Alliteration aside, White, I think I'll take my chances in the tournament.

I got a Firefox extension called DownThemAll!. It's been very useful so far in downloading long sequences of images (here, giantesscity, now Arania's site...) Some of you might want to check it out. After all, it's a lot easier to page through the images once they're all downloaded to a folder, and you can simply delete the .jpg files if you don't like them.

OP: Thanks for bringing the update to our attention. I liked the sequence.

[DangerousCharles]

Crikey O'Reilley.

Everybody, do get over yourselves.

[John Colburn]

A general response:

I don't know why so many people are upset that there's been an argument here. Are you so afraid of conflict that you can't even read a thread where people don't get along?

Amazingly enough, open disagreement and worthwhile conversation are not mutually exclusive. This thread has been more fun and educational than most of the others I've read around here.

[cpt soban]

People seem to presume anything other than complacence is bad.