Another Paradigm Shift process

[tjlemke]

Originally Posted by Lord T Hawkeye

Constructive criticism is what I did. I stated specifically what I was unsatisfied about the comic and did not at any point make personal attacks.

You on the other hand, in a grand display of projection, called me a whiner and deemed me unqualified to hold an opinion about said comic on the basis that I have not published a book or comic of my own.

If you can't understand why that's a legendarily flawed argument, let me present you with a parallel.

If you said that Batman and Robin was a terrible movie and someone came back with "Well you're not a director so what do you know?", what would your reaction be? Once you stopped laughing that is.

Protip: Don't use arguments that you yourself would not accept.

Sure but you don't say how you didn't like Batman and Robin at the Return of the King movie theater (when the Batman and Robin movie theater was across the street). If you're going to critique Batman and Robin, do it someplace more appropriate or at the very least sound less bitchy so everyone around you won't want to stap their ears with nails. I mean post your critique over there so you MIGHT do something than preach to the choir over here where nobody really cares.

Never said that. Action is just as capable of overstaying it's welcome but nobody said anything about endless fight scenes or anything now did they?
Polarizing is not an argument either.

And I never said you said that. I was merely pointing out how you said there was a lack of action and using the example that having more action doesn't necessarily make a better story.

Nirvanna fallacy. Try again

Wait wha-? How the hell is it the nirvana fallacy if I'm using sarcasm. It's like calling a mirage unrealistic. No shit it's unrealistic, IT'S NOT REAL!!

[Lord T Hawkeye]

Originally Posted by tjlemke

Sure but you don't say how you didn't like Batman and Robin at the Return of the King movie theater (when the Batman and Robin movie theater was across the street).

So now I stand accused of posting something off topic? Strange, I'm quite certain this IS a thread about the Paradigm Shift comic. If I've misread the thread title, I do sincerely apologize.

If you're going to critique Batman and Robin, do it someplace more appropriate or at the very least sound less bitchy so everyone around you won't want to stap their ears with nails.

So you are complaining to me that complaining is a bad thing and I shouldn't do it?

I mean post your critique over there so you MIGHT do something than preach to the choir over here where nobody really cares.

So you are taking the time to repeatedly inform me that you don't care about my opinion?

You'll find me to be somewhat less than convinced.

And I never said you said that. I was merely pointing out how you said there was a lack of action and using the example that having more action doesn't necessarily make a better story.

By action I mean events which all stories must have. My ire is that the conversations are interrupting the flow of the story and overstay their welcome.

Wait wha-? How the hell is it the nirvana fallacy if I'm using sarcasm. It's like calling a mirage unrealistic. No shit it's unrealistic, IT'S NOT REAL!!

I understand it's sarcasm. What you were inferring with it is that since my opinion did not immediatly change the author's mind, it is thus invalid and worthless. Yet however, you at this moment are presenting me with your opinion despite knowing full well that I'm not likely to immediately change it based solely on that.

In other words, you are holding me to a higher standard to what you are holding yourself. That is the nirvanna fallacy.

[tjlemke]

Originally Posted by Lord T Hawkeye

So now I stand accused of posting something off topic? Strange, I'm quite certain this IS a thread about the Paradigm Shift comic. If I've misread the thread title, I do sincerely apologize.



So you are complaining to me that complaining is a bad thing and I shouldn't do it?



So you are taking the time to repeatedly inform me that you don't care about my opinion?

You'll find me to be somewhat less than convinced.



By action I mean events which all stories must have. My ire is that the conversations are interrupting the flow of the story and overstay their welcome.



I understand it's sarcasm. What you were inferring with it is that since my opinion did not immediatly change the author's mind, it is thus invalid and worthless. Yet however, you at this moment are presenting me with your opinion despite knowing full well that I'm not likely to immediately change it based solely on that.

In other words, you are holding me to a higher standard to what you are holding yourself. That is the nirvanna fallacy.

You're an idiot. Although what you said is on loose ground I'll go ahead and stop this right here. (Because I have better things to do than argue with some jackass whom doesn't have a life and nobody likes. Good luck with that)

[Lord T Hawkeye]

Originally Posted by tjlemke

You're an idiot. Although what you said is on loose ground I'll go ahead and stop this right here. (Because I have better things to do than argue with some jackass whom doesn't have a life and nobody likes. Good luck with that)

I hate to correct a ranter but you provoked it so kindly don't try and make me out to be the bully please.