Stupid Creationist!

[genderhazard]

Originally Posted by TF-Viewer

... when he found out that humans had altered the banana.. he just automatically jumps to "god gave man the knowledge and ability to alter the banana" it's such a facepalm moment. That's just being stubborn.

Really no different than the was some evolutionist behave.

Thanks for the vid Hawkeye.

Rachael enjoy your meeting with Richard Dawkins

[OhZone]

Originally Posted by genderhazard

Really no different that the was some evolutionist behave.

Rachael enjoy your meeting with Richard Dawkins

OHMY! Ben Stein. What a delusional nin-cowpoop. So you got Dawkins to consider a far fetched but possible science fiction idea for a moment. Has nothing to do with the real argument. Oh, well.

[Lord T Hawkeye]

Originally Posted by genderhazard

Really no different that the was some evolutionist behave.

Rachael enjoy your meeting with Richard Dawkins

That interview was debunked already. Dawkins was interviewed under false pretences and his statements taken out of context. Ben Stein's film was a tribute to intellectual dishonesty that even Micheal Moore would find shameful.

[TF-Viewer]

Originally Posted by genderhazard

Really no different that the was some evolutionist behave.

Did you mean, "than the way"? I'm just trying to make sure I understood you.

[genderhazard]

yes typo.

So has Dawkins recanted his statement?

[Rachel Bronwyn]

ZOMG, DAWKINS IS WILLING TO ENTERTAIN FARFETCHED IDEAS? CRAY-ZEEEE!!!

That's because he has an "open mind". He doesn't dismiss things until he's confirmed they are a) unverifiable/unlikely or b) false.

The science fiction-esque ideas Dawkins entertains are entirely different from the idea of gawd for one reason: they are products of the natural world and not magic. Gawd is. Jeebus is. There is not a supernatural element to anything Dawkins indulges.

I will enjoy my time with him tomorrow. I'm going with a dear friend who has a rack almost the size of mine. I don't know how we'll fit in the room together with Richard!

Originally Posted by Lord T Hawkeye

That interview was debunked already. Dawkins was interviewed under false pretences and his statements taken out of context.

Creationists being dishonest snakes? You're kidding! Wait - that's the basis of their belief.

Ben Stein's film was a tribute to intellectual dishonesty that even Micheal Moore would find shameful.

Word.

[qzar9999]

Originally Posted by Rachel Bronwyn

Creationists being dishonest snakes? You're kidding! Wait - that's the basis of their belief.

Really now. Is something like this necessary? Really? The constant "gawd" and "jeebus" are bad enough, and make you sound a wee bit like certain not-particularly-intelligent television characters, but really. I think the ref should take a point away for that one.

[OhZone]

lulz

What's there to recant? The star seed theory has been around a while, but it doesn't mean that there was any ultimate supernatural cloud being behind it all.


Doesn't mean there isn't either.

Oh, well.

[genderhazard]

Hawkeye indicated Dawkins was interviewed under false pretences and his statements taken out of context.

Rachael and your statement seem to indicate that he stands by his statement (which by the way is not why I posted that video.) but that they should be given no weight.

[LOD]

[OhZone]

Originally Posted by liveordie83

Good GOD!

[Rachel Bronwyn]

That literally made my friend fall out of his chair, laughing.

"God done did it!"

That's creationist logic for you, right there.