Alice In Wonderland

[wolfman-al]

Originally Posted by caccoloso89

New picture on deviantart:
http://rathsantosh.deviantart.com/ar...land-130323835

That one is incredible!!!

[50percentgrey]

SPOILER: it seems there will be 2 growth scenes: the first, classic, in the hallway... She eats the piece of cake and grows out of her clothes; the other one is with the red queen (with ripped clothes too)... From the description there will be popping buttons, little skirt, ecc ecc...
I think this movie will be EPIC!

With the red queen? Whatever happened to the White Rabbit's house? I liked that part the BEST!

But from what you described from the script, I'm kind of skeptical about the clothes destuction...

[shniglebop]

the downloadable script is written by Linda Woolverton, who just happens to be the screenwriter for the tim burton movie. or at least imdb.com seems to think so. YAY! i'm guessing that they're going to do the clothes destruction similar to the way the did the shrinking. she'll still be covered, but the destruction will be visible somehow. obviously we won't know until a clip or the movie comes out. also, they may have updated the script to include the rabbits house scene, although this is indeed a sequel to the original story. rrrrrrrrrgh i can't wait!

[Balugawhale]

hoping those shoes wont last very long

[Mr Wayne]

Ladies & Gentleman,

Here is a plausible scenario to support some clothes destruction without revealing too much skin:

Now that we're in the aftermath of the Monsters Vs. Aliens growth scene where Susan's wedding dress did somewhat get ripped apart, I think because of that risk-taking scene, Tim Burton's crew either might push it one step further (as live action instead of cartoons) or compose the same minimal-clothes destruction comparable to Susan's in MvA.

I just downloaded the.pdf script file but haven't read it yet, but from the shrinking scene alone, its possible Burton might showcase some level of clothes destruction for the 2 growth scenes. And I agree with Clevens about withholding footage of either growth scene from the current trailer= They're teasing the audience, LoL. By the time the final trailer rolls out every growth fan at this forum will be bouncing off the walls so much with anticipation we'll be shaking from head to toe. Besides, its Alice in Wonderland. The thought of a seasoned director producing a new rendition of it with actual people and clothes destruction leaves me speechless and giddy to be frank. I CAN'T WAIT! lol. Sorry, kinda slipped out :P One thing is for sure, I'll be keeping an eye on this thread for the rest of the year.



VolfsBayne


p.s. I CAN'T WAIT! Wait... did I already say that? ;-P If this is a legit script of Tim Burton's movie then there is no doubt for me. Tim Burton is taking Disney's cartoon version of Alice in Wonderland and remaking it "how it should've been done", which is realistically (with the clothes rippage). Even though it mentions nudity in the 2nd growth sequence, idc if there is nudity. If they do the clothes destruction slow, and just right, I'll be in Fem Growth heaven for years. This is the Holy Grail of Fem Growth for me, having realized the fantasy from watching Disney's AiW cartoon version when I was little.
~**March 2010 - Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland... Where it all begins again!**~
I subscribed to this thread, so many thanx to any future info on Burton's movie, I'll be keeping a close eye on it now. Keep up the good work.

[50percentgrey]

Okay, you guys. I might as well finish what I started here, but I'm kind if unsure...

This E.A.T.M.E. comic I've been posting here has been kind of underappreciated, and I doubt anyone would say a thing about it now, because I just finished it. I've finished E.A.T.M.E., and yet I'm debating whether I should post the rest here, as I've done on FurAffinity.net, or just go ahead submit it to the Process Productions Store without giving away the last 6 pages.

I don't know. What's your opinion? Should I show or should I sell?

[resiz3d]

Originally Posted by 50percentgrey

Okay, you guys. I might as well finish what I started here, but I'm kind if unsure...

This E.A.T.M.E. comic I've been posting here has been kind of underappreciated, and I doubt anyone would say a thing about it now, because I just finished it. I've finished E.A.T.M.E., and yet I'm debating whether I should post the rest here, as I've done on FurAffinity.net, or just go ahead submit it to the Process Productions Store without giving away the last 6 pages.

I don't know. What's your opinion? Should I show or should I sell?

Maybe it'd have more appreciation in the expansion forum?

[50percentgrey]

Why? Because it involves a fat bunny girl?

I think it would be best if I posted it in the "Everything Else" forum. How about that?

[resiz3d]

Disney doesn't always "make" everything with their named stamped on it, many times it's just their distribution.

[Hellstromm, Son of Satan]

But in this case, it's true.

Disney had a huge hand in the production of this movie.

Why?

Because they see the 1951 animated version as a flop, a failure and a shame, and thus want to give the public a better Wonderland movie.

[resiz3d]

Originally Posted by Hellstromm, Son of Satan

But in this case, it's true.

Disney had a huge hand in the production of this movie.

Why?

Because they see the 1951 animated version as a flop, a failure and a shame, and thus want to give the public a better Wonderland movie.

Where are you getting this from?

Yes, many of the Disney movies weren't commercial successes when first released, but have MORE than made their money/worth in re-releases, VHS and DVD and other merchandising.

[Hellstromm, Son of Satan]

Several sites: Wikipedia, imdb, official sites...

It doesn't matter what you think, it matter what Disney thinks, and Disney thinks that movie was a failure.