Evil conversion(for the lack for better term)

[dracolych49]

Originally Posted by Sordes

Regarding the Makeup one. Currently I agree it does not belong, I was one of those that heavily deffended it before, but there has been no EC in it really for several weeks. The week we argued there where several pieces, I dont mind it being added if any EC pics gets added in there. Or alterations to EC pics making them basicly an other version of it. But perhaps we should compromise on the bit not ot link it intil something is actualy posted in it that warrants its post here?

Eh, have to agree with Sordes. Occasionally they have something good, but most of them don't make the cut. It's like the works from this guy. His evil conversions are great, but his stuff where the girls just have things written on them, not so much. (The only reason I put in the link is that I don't know his pen name.)

This case would be one of the few I would actually say put in a link to just that image, instead of the whole Kankuro list. Might miss the few good pictures while eyes glaze over because of the rest.

[dracolych49]

Originally Posted by inui

Ok, no problem... I stop annoying you with these threads.

It is not annoying, just misplaced (most of the time).

[Sarasa]

Part 2 of the Weekly 2ch thread has started

http://jun.2chan.net/b/res/14862417.htm

[Xanderfox]

Originally Posted by dracolych49

It is not annoying, just misplaced (most of the time).

That was the point I wanted to make, it's misplaced, just start a tread in "and everything else" that's where "doesn't exactly fit" type stuff goes.

[kyuven]

Originally Posted by dracolych49

IT IS DONE, +1!

The person who had commissioned Mr. DNA to do the Overlord Bob transformations, the series has been completed, and the list of links to the various parts are here! It has Good being turned to Evil! It has... well, it is just that cool! It has stuff from Mr. DNA, Powerman2k, BlackShirtBoy, and commissioned by ZeroForever!

And not only is that up, so is a little thing he did called Harlequinade! It's a commission for, I assume, Ben Winfield. I don't know who that is, but it is definitely worth a read. Not Safe for Work, though.

hehe...omni-clean...

[kalten77]

Originally Posted by DrMoreau

I really don't think arguing about what does and doesn't qualify as corruption is worth the trouble. We have a great thread here, one of the best and frankly why mess with that formula by alienating people. There are broad catagories and not everything is for everyone, but exposure is nice and it's certainly great we get so many updates and keep this thread so active.

Don't know about all of you, but I'd certainly rather have vaguely EC posts than posts of people arguing about what is an isn't EC.

Quoting this again for emphasis. I have yet to understand this insistence on splitting hairs in a topic that already runs on the premise on incorporating a wide variety of interpretations of EC. The topic isn't any more productive or relevant than it was two months ago.

[Xanderfox]

Originally Posted by kalten77

Quoting this again for emphasis. I have yet to understand this insistence on splitting hairs in a topic that already runs on the premise on incorporating a wide variety of interpretations of EC. The topic isn't any more productive or relevant than it was two months ago.

the point is Makeup is NOT Evil Conversion, Makeup is NOT transformation. It just isn't, because involves no physical transformation and no mental transformation, it just involves applying color to the face or body. Yes Evil conversion often involves a character change their clothing or makeup, but doing that is not the transformation unless specific context says so. Again it's NOT transformation. It's not splitting hairs to say non-transformation is not transformation. The makeup thread is about makeup, a transformation related picture MIGHT be posted in there, in which case the picture should be re-posted here

[kyuven]

A lot of the gangurofication threads do, however, include a caption dictating a sense of corruption of the body and mind.
after all, we're not so much linking directly to a specific set of images, but rather a thread that has the potential to have corruption/EC in it.
Hell, without any context, some of the actual 2chan EC threads are nothing but blue skin photoshops of existing pictures, but THEY still count.
Given context, i could, with a single paragraph, make an EC picture un-EC and a non-EC picture into EC

[Twilightdrgn]

Originally Posted by kyuven

A lot of the gangurofication threads do, however, include a caption dictating a sense of corruption of the body and mind.
after all, we're not so much linking directly to a specific set of images, but rather a thread that has the potential to have corruption/EC in it.
Hell, without any context, some of the actual 2chan EC threads are nothing but blue skin photoshops of existing pictures, but THEY still count.
Given context, i could, with a single paragraph, make an EC picture un-EC and a non-EC picture into EC

This is true. Now everyone stop complaining and post some EC porn.

[kalten77]

Originally Posted by Xanderfox

the point is Makeup is NOT Evil Conversion, Makeup is NOT transformation. It just isn't, because involves no physical transformation and no mental transformation, it just involves applying color to the face or body. Yes Evil conversion often involves a character change their clothing or makeup, but doing that is not the transformation unless specific context says so. Again it's NOT transformation. It's not splitting hairs to say non-transformation is not transformation. The makeup thread is about makeup, a transformation related picture MIGHT be posted in there, in which case the picture should be re-posted here

That's incorrect and you already know that; you already admitted as much that makeup can imply mental transformation in context. Please don't state your opinion as fact in the following post

The more valid part of your argument is whether it is process or not, which is what I labeled as 'hairsplitting'. Why is it a necessity to remove these offshoots from the thread when they are more than tangentially related? There are plenty of viewers who do not share your opinion here, myself included.

[DrMoreau]

Amusing (and perhaps what we all need).

http://singory.deviantart.com/gallery/#/d30yidn

By the by, dracolych49 made a pretty cool post and we were all too caught up in arguing this to catch it or atleast congratulate him..

Awesome by the way dracolych49.

[kyuven]

Originally Posted by DrMoreau

Amusing (and perhaps what we all need).

http://singory.deviantart.com/gallery/#/d30yidn

By the by, dracolych49 made a pretty cool post and we were all too caught up in arguing this to catch it or atleast congratulate him..

Awesome by the way dracolych49.

cool concept, i just wish it wasn't...furry.
Nothin' against furries, just doesn't do it for me >_>

And yeah the Overlord Bob thing had me crackin' up towards the end in a few places...