free hit counters
Birth control, wombs, dead babies, idiots - Page 11 - The Process Forum
The Process Forum  

Go Back   The Process Forum > The Process General > General Discussion

Inflation and Process ClipsProcess Productions Store Inflation and Process Clips

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-03-2013   #121
Sephie
EYES UP HERE
 
Sephie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Over the Mountains Of the Moon, Down the Valley of the Shadow
Posts: 9,693
Re: Birth control, wombs, dead babies, idiots

could you two take this to private messages. This sounds rather personal.
__________________
You can also call me by my title, "Her Omniscient Bitchyness" or H.O.B. For short
Source for avatar: http://clayrseer.deviantart.com/art/...12209#/d3a5yq0
Sephie is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2013   #122
vincent_richter
ミンナニ ナイショダヨ
 
vincent_richter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Canard
Posts: 6,091
Re: Birth control, wombs, dead babies, idiots

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel Bronwyn View Post
Not sure why I should be surprised by you *actually* respecting me either. I'm a pretty respectable gal. I'm imperfect as they come but I'm clever as all get out and great at what I do in an industry that's hostile to anyone of my gender. I'm a responsible adult and supportive friend and adoring sister and reliable student and employee. I'm worthy of respect, even if I am a little bit fat and do drink too much.
Oh, come off it; I agree with you, but I'm not going to stroke your ego anymore.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephie
could you two take this to private messages. This sounds rather personal.
Nope! See, I'm one of those disrespectful douchebags who loves to derail threads every chance I get. That's me in a nutshell.
__________________
If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
vincent_richter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2013   #123
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Birth control, wombs, dead babies, idiots

Quote:
Originally Posted by vincent_richter View Post
The really sad part is that we're all wrong for each other, and it took me this long to realize it. I wish we could work, but "swing" (sub / dom) relationships rarely work out over long distances and multiple stressors. Too hard to communicate.
This another example of "..... whaaaaa?" I haven't been in a sub/dom relationship for about a year now. You were certainly never part of one, to my knowledge.

Quote:
EDIT: I stopped talking to you because you told me to worry about bettering myself. When I start trying to do that - which is a right jolly ol' BITCH with clinical depression off-meds - I'm selfishly ignoring you. Why even pretend to be surprised anymore?
Again, wha? I don't know what you're talking about. I do want you to better yourself just as I want everyone to. You do present as a particularly dissatisfied individual though. If that means ignoring me, awesome. I totally support and encourage that, hence the lack of railing against you. I haven't even pestered you. I don't know what I've done to indicate otherwise. I've just gone forward with my life.

I don't know if you're talking about you or I or someone else with regards to depression and meds. I'm drugged to the gills because I'm scared about how going off meds would affect my professional and academic performance. It might be no big deal but I can't afford to take the chance.

Quote:
Also, re: discussion of reproductive rights? Don't do that to me, you know better than that. I'm calling a spade a spade, and you drew and quartered an entire demographic because they didn't agree with your perspective 100%. That's not intelligent discussion, that is the very definition of a flame.
I genuinely don't know what you're talking about. I laughed at people who don't understand rudimentary biology and told people in general that derailing sincere discussion with gun wanks or roleplaying was douchey. I don't know what demographic I excluded. I don't care if you're an RPer or gun owner. I appreciate your participation. I don't appreciate derailing with pet topics. I welcome all thoughts on the topic at hand and admonished all those derailing said topic.

And let's not be hyperbolic; no one was drawn and quartered. Violent imagery as a representation of "Don't do that" isn't helpful.

Quote:
Honestly, you're not the only one to ever do that, and it elicits a chuckle from me every time I read it.
OK? I'm just confused.
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2013   #124
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Birth control, wombs, dead babies, idiots

Quote:
Originally Posted by vincent_richter View Post
Oh, come off it; I agree with you, but I'm not going to stroke your ego anymore.
Again, I don't understand. Where did I request ego stroking? I didn't ask for it nor do I require it. I'm pretty secure in my worthiness as a human being and scientist.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephie View Post
could you two take this to private messages. This sounds rather personal.
That is a perfectly reasonable request. I will respect it.

I will not respond to anymore posts of a personal nature in this thread or any other.
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2013   #125
Blondie
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
 
Blondie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,522
Re: Birth control, wombs, dead babies, idiots

I wished I had saved a certain person's chats.
__________________
I LOVE you all.
Blondie is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2013   #126
Sephie
EYES UP HERE
 
Sephie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Over the Mountains Of the Moon, Down the Valley of the Shadow
Posts: 9,693
Re: Birth control, wombs, dead babies, idiots

Its not that I would rather not read your squabbles, I can skip them. It is just that when disagreements are done in public people can get hurt more easily
__________________
You can also call me by my title, "Her Omniscient Bitchyness" or H.O.B. For short
Source for avatar: http://clayrseer.deviantart.com/art/...12209#/d3a5yq0
Sephie is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2013   #127
vincent_richter
ミンナニ ナイショダヨ
 
vincent_richter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Canard
Posts: 6,091
Re: Birth control, wombs, dead babies, idiots

I think I will drop the personal discussion, if only because it does nothing to address the sole issue I take with this thread. It is indeed, as has been said before, a private matter best left to PMs and such.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel Bronwyn
I genuinely don't know what you're talking about. I laughed at people who don't understand rudimentary biology and told people in general that derailing sincere discussion with gun wanks or roleplaying was douchey.
Would you agree with this definition of flaming? If not, how do you define the term as it relates to the rest of the world?

Quote:
I don't care if you're an RPer or gun owner. I appreciate your participation. I don't appreciate derailing with pet topics. I welcome all thoughts on the topic at hand and admonished all those derailing said topic.
The topic was created to ridicule an entire subset of society. Given, a particularly stupid subset of society, but let's not pretend that its intent is to be educational. At that point, admonitions become rather moot, n'cest pas?

Quote:
And let's not be hyperbolic; no one was drawn and quartered. Violent imagery as a representation of "Don't do that" isn't helpful.
It's a fair analogy to the jackassery on the Conservative side that throws out images of Soviet Russia or Nazi concentration camps every time the Liberal side even mentions the term "re-education." It's the counterpoint that, if we're not allowed to re-educate the ignorant, they are better off with no rights at all. It's a bullshit cop-out, and if my imagery offends, then THANK CHRIST I HOPE SO. It means you have a logical bone left in your body, which is more than I can say of many detractors of *any* government cutbacks.

Quote:
OK? I'm just confused.
You shouldn't be; you lambasted an entire subset for their idiocy.
If pointing out such poor fools wasn't meant in jest, I find it to be in rather poor taste.
It's not as if they know any better.
__________________
If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
vincent_richter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2013   #128
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Birth control, wombs, dead babies, idiots

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephie View Post
Its not that I would rather not read your squabbles, I can skip them. It is just that when disagreements are done in public people can get hurt more easily
Fucking WORD.
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2013   #129
vincent_richter
ミンナニ ナイショダヨ
 
vincent_richter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Canard
Posts: 6,091
Re: Birth control, wombs, dead babies, idiots

Fair enough and agreed; now, to the point at hand: was this thread meant to ridicule, and - given that you answer in the affirmative - how is it possible to derail that which is already derailed?
__________________
If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
vincent_richter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2013   #130
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Birth control, wombs, dead babies, idiots

EDIT: This post was inflammatory and added nothing to the discussion at hand, hence my decision to remove it. I am sorry.
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2013   #131
vincent_richter
ミンナニ ナイショダヨ
 
vincent_richter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Canard
Posts: 6,091
Re: Birth control, wombs, dead babies, idiots

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel Bronwyn View Post
EDIT: This post was inflammatory and added nothing to the discussion at hand, hence my decision to remove it. I am sorry.
Yeah, sorry, only interested in holding posts against you where you use self-preservation as a cop-out against acknowledging your own flames.

EDIT: This post is my legit take on the inflammatory post previously posted and shall only be removed by the administration.
__________________
If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
vincent_richter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-03-2013   #132
Rachel Bronwyn
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,002
Re: Birth control, wombs, dead babies, idiots

Flaming is an intentional behaviour. I like to believe no one here is as flaming fucking stupid as people who think uteruses of women who have used birth control are dead baby graveyards. Laughing at people one doesn't believe to be present doesn't constitute flaming as there is no one present to inflame. I'm not going to acknowledge flaming anyone as I don't believe anyone present would become inflamed by such remarks.

If I believed anyone present actually agreed with the sentiment presented in the OP and was trying to get them riled up, hell yeah, it would constitute flaming. But I don't. I genuinely don't believe anyone with posting ability on this forum is that stupid. I believe it's something most everyone here can lolol about and, from there, start a dialogue on the matter.

If you want to continue being horrible to me, you're welcome to do so, but it would behoove you to recognise I don't deserve it and it's a reflection of you, not me. If you're so disinterest in interacting with me, do me a favour and extend that policy to this forum. If you respect me as you claim, the best way to do so would be to refrain from being horrible to me.
Rachel Bronwyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.