free hit counters
How do I argue against this? - The Process Forum
The Process Forum  

Go Back   The Process Forum > The Process General > General Discussion

Inflation and Process ClipsProcess Productions Store Inflation and Process Clips

Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-04-2021   #1
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 298
How do I argue against this?

So someone on kiwifarms caught me making a comission here:

It was brought up as an ad homenim against my arguing that homosexuals aren't child molesters:

There "logic" is as follows:

There is no conflation to be made. It is as easy as this: If the childform was no part of your fetish, why even include it and request it? Why commission art about it? why have people write about it? There would be no need. So it is part of your fetish, and thusly, part of your sexual arousal that ties to this kind of thing.

The answer to this is: If there is no need for the childform to be an element of your desires, it would not be there. It does give you sexual arousal, and since, as I stated before, you seek it out and sought it out for over a decade, it is certainly sexual attraction present. That you are denying the obvious is just retarded.

Sexual attraction indicates you find someone, or in some cases, something, sexually appealing to you. In your case, you find TG stuff, sexually appealing. This, for you, also seem to involve child-characters.

Sexual arousal indicates you have some sort of physical response to something. Meaning this shit, gives you a boner and gets your libido going. So in short, this does not really make your argument any better at all, if anything it tells us you pop a boner when you look at little winnie transforming and want to give your wee-micro a helping hand. So to speak.
These people don't understand that arousal form transformation has nothing to do with attraction. Right?

Last edited by Jake; 10-04-2021 at 09:00 PM.
Jake is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-05-2021   #2
Prof_Sai's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Earth, mostly
Posts: 5,682
Re: How do I argue against this?

Some people respond to abuse by developing a need to abuse others. They think that attacking and demonizing someone else makes them less awful by comparison. The reason WHY they attack is irrelevant. Assure them that you aren't X, and they will just find Y as a new reason to attack. All the words are excuses.
I can't see the sigs, they are too high.
Prof_Sai is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.