01-31-2010 | #25 |
Tieing a Knot Or two
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Breaking Down The Walls Of Your Imagination.
Posts: 19,660
|
Re: Good Process Tg
Most fetish forum sites have a rule stating that you must have a description of the material in the title.
Let's say you found a growth pic for instance you would title the thread. Growth pic(minigiantess, clothes ripping, nudity) It helps when you are using this site's search tool, and it helps keep things like this from turning into a 2 page flame war. |
01-31-2010 | #26 |
English 真城の城 Webmaster
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 110
|
Re: Good Process Tg
You have no idea how easy it would be for me to be extremely scornful of your claim of innocence, Katt. So instead (in the interests of not starting a "yes you did/no I didn't" argument), I'll go for a dry recitation of events. Yours was the first comment in that thread, in which you said you couldn't have told that it was a TG pic. His response was that it was a character from a video game and should have been obvious.
Your response after that was that it was out of proportion and that you couldn't really tell what the proportions were. Things continued in this vein for several more posts before Quarma got fed up and snapped at you, which of course ensured that the argument continued for the better part of three pages. The point is, regardless of what responsibility Quarma might bear for what happened in that thread, you bear quite a bit of responsibility for it yourself. Fault does not imply that only one person was responsible, and in fact more than one person can and usually does bear fault for an argument or incident. If you want to bring up the lack of an age warning to Lorekeep, that's fine and I'd suggest you do so. But even with an age warning, that's still beside the point. It just absolves the site of responsibility, but it won't stop minors from visiting anyway, regardless of whatever warnings might be put up. I believe the saying about "youthful folly" applies here. Be that as it may, not everyone moves out of their parents' home when they're eighteen. And even if someone has a private computer of their own, that doesn't necessarily mean that they have complete privacy. Should they thus never visit a site like this, on the off chance that someone might barge in or look over their shoulder without them noticing? EDIT--Thanks for pointing that out, liveordie83. That's in large part what I was trying to get at. I'm pretty sure this forum has such a rule too (for example, DG for dickgirl, SW for swap, etc). |
01-31-2010 | #27 |
Tieing a Knot Or two
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Breaking Down The Walls Of Your Imagination.
Posts: 19,660
|
Re: Good Process Tg
I come to this site all the time for non-porn related things....
I private message my friends, roleplay, debate, and BS around. Last edited by LOD; 01-31-2010 at 07:02 AM. |
01-31-2010 | #28 |
Process Fan
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 30
|
Re: Good Process Tg
This argument is BS. Quarma: you're on this site/registered for this site, been on this site before . . . you should know that 'mature' content exists. I can't understand why that wouldn't occur to you.
This isn't even my main point tho': The argument is about the 'ideal' (perfectly categorized process material,) against the actual (a group of nice/fun people who share whatever process they find. It's a fairly lax community, and I don't know why everyone on this thread is suddenly up in arms.) The place is what it is. Quarma as far as I'm concerned . . . you're to blame: even if you didn't expect TG, why in the name of all that is good and holy would you be using a FETISH SITE (especially the portion of that site devoted to TG) while your parents were ANYWHERE NEAR YOUR ROOM. It might not have been porn, but I'm sure you'd love to explain why you're looking at pictures of guys turning into girls . . . (Someone used the fairly ridiculous 'well how could he ever go on this site blah blah blah. My reccomendation: while not everything on this site is pr0n, act like it was. I trust you've had some experience.) |
01-31-2010 | #29 |
Process Fan
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 30
|
Re: Good Process Tg
ED: Honestly I feel a little bad for raging like I did.
Quarma, my point was this site has nudity, mature content and other stuff. . . If that isn't what you're looking for, I suggest http://the-zappy-haven.deviantart.com/ (DA 'sub-site': all of which is technically SFW, even if it is fetish/tg.) |
01-31-2010 | #30 |
Guardian of the OverKitty
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The worst scumhole in the galaxy, Teddy Bear Junction.
Posts: 3,270
|
Re: Good Process Tg
He posted a picture of A. Non-process and B. on a forum... what did he expect to happen? Comments go both ways, good or bad... I was just trying to be civil about it and offer constructive criticism.
And what would you have us do? Do you wish for Lorekeep (the only admin I'm aware of now) or each topic creater to go back and edit each and every single title with 'SFW' or 'NSFW'? That's just ridiculous... The point is, if 'you' (generally speaking) are on this site... use common sense. Hell, just my signature alone contains nudity, and if I haven't gotten flagged/warned for that... why should someone who posts a topic containing nudity get flamed?
__________________
|
01-31-2010 | #31 |
Lurker-EX & Topic Sinker
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 275
|
Re: Good Process Tg
Fantastic seq! Not sure what's the drama about though, can't be bothered, I've seen less flames about in a topic with zero processes.
|
01-31-2010 | #32 |
EYES UP HERE
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Over the Mountains Of the Moon, Down the Valley of the Shadow
Posts: 9,693
|
Re: Good Process Tg
The question was asked, "why would you be on this sight if you were not a sexual fetishist>". For me the reason was that this site linked to stories where individuals had to deal with being trapped in the wrong gender.
__________________
You can also call me by my title, "Her Omniscient Bitchyness" or H.O.B. For short Source for avatar: http://clayrseer.deviantart.com/art/...12209#/d3a5yq0 |
01-31-2010 | #33 |
Process Disciple
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,258
|
Re: Good Process Tg
You're an idiot.
__________________
|
01-31-2010 | #34 |
Modest Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,998
|
Re: Good Process Tg
This site as a whole is NSFW, NSFFamily, NSFAnythingbutbeingathomealone.
And seriously, the 'socialization' aspect? If you're friends with someone on here and you just want to talk to them, get their AIM, Yahoo, MSN, Skype, ICQ, Trillian, etc, etc, etc ID and talk there if you want to do it around family. If the site was www.puppiesfrolic.com/forum, yeah, I'd be a little upset about it not being labeled as NSFW.
__________________
Meh. Cranky and old. |
01-31-2010 | #35 | |
EYES UP HERE
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Over the Mountains Of the Moon, Down the Valley of the Shadow
Posts: 9,693
|
Re: Good Process Tg
Quote:
__________________
You can also call me by my title, "Her Omniscient Bitchyness" or H.O.B. For short Source for avatar: http://clayrseer.deviantart.com/art/...12209#/d3a5yq0 |
|
01-31-2010 | #36 |
Modest Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,998
|
Re: Good Process Tg
Then that is fantastic for you, Bosch.
BUT do you expect 100% of the time to have your desires met in the SFW regard?
__________________
Meh. Cranky and old. |
|
|