What would this be qualified as?

[TrumanGrace]

Originally Posted by PrBlahBlahtson

It all depends on intent. If you draw a picture of an underage girl having sex with an adult in way that's intended to provoke arousal, I do believe that potentially falls under child pornography. Yes, it's only a drawing, BUT it's still an intentional depiction of a minor having sex with an adult for the purpose of the viewer's sexual enjoyment. Keep in mind, there's a difference between "artistic expression" and porn, and if you think about it, you can tell the difference. And the fun part of intent is nobody sees things the same way as everybody else.

If we're talking about legal terms, then in the US, it has to be real photographs/movies, rather than artwork. I can't recall the exact case, but it was something the Supreme Court decided.

[OhZone]

It's F2F.


(The better kind of F2F with "increased beauty"

http://www.process-productions.com/f...ead.php?t=8593

)