What would this be qualified as?

PrBlahBlahtson · 09-05-2007

It all depends on intent. If you draw a picture of an underage girl having sex with an adult in way that's intended to provoke arousal, I do believe that potentially falls under child pornography. Yes, it's only a drawing, BUT it's still an intentional depiction of a minor having sex with an adult for the purpose of the viewer's sexual enjoyment. Keep in mind, there's a difference between "artistic expression" and porn, and if you think about it, you can tell the difference. And the fun part of intent is nobody sees things the same way as everybody else.

That being said, I'm not a fan of AR myself. Yeah, I've been known to like AP material, but I've always been kind of wary because I know that gray zone is out there. Guess I'll have to dig up some law references tomorrow and see if I can understand it once and for all.

09-05-2007	#12
PrBlahBlahtson is not a mod. Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Northeast USA Posts: 4,188	It all depends on intent. If you draw a picture of an underage girl having sex with an adult in way that's intended to provoke arousal, I do believe that potentially falls under child pornography. Yes, it's only a drawing, BUT it's still an intentional depiction of a minor having sex with an adult for the purpose of the viewer's sexual enjoyment. Keep in mind, there's a difference between "artistic expression" and porn, and if you think about it, you can tell the difference. And the fun part of intent is nobody sees things the same way as everybody else. That being said, I'm not a fan of AR myself. Yeah, I've been known to like AP material, but I've always been kind of wary because I know that gray zone is out there. Guess I'll have to dig up some law references tomorrow and see if I can understand it once and for all. __________________ It's not that I don't like you. I'm just direct.