According to Jim [AP/BE]

[darththeo]

Originally Posted by theinter

LOL at loli boobs

You should have wrote "LOLi BOOBS"

I laughed at it myself ...
Then I thought, what did the Parents of those two young actresses think when they found out about the scene? Were they upset? Shocked? Or didn't care because they are getting tons of money.

I have to say I am shocked to see that on a show that is on ABC ... which isn't it owned by Disney now?

[catfish27]

Originally Posted by darththeo

Then I thought, what did the Parents of those two young actresses think when they found out about the scene? Were they upset? Shocked? Or didn't care because they are getting tons of money.

There really wasn't that much to it -- it was totally played for laughs as opposed to sexuality (they weren't even showing any cleavage). It also helps that breasts are only secondary sexual characteristics anyway -- the censor probably wouldn't have let it pass if Jim had made a wish that resulted in the girls coming downstairs with huge camel toes visible in their pants, for example.

I have to say I am shocked to see that on a show that is on ABC ... which isn't it owned by Disney now?

Yeah, ABC's been owned by Disney for years. But Disney's certainly not breast-unfriendly. Heck, they're famous for having sent an entire generation of boys through puberty in the 1950s when they put Annette Funicello in a tight sweater on "The Mickey Mouse Club."

Come to think of it, the one show I regularly watch on ABC is "Pushing Daisies," which certainly has plenty of cleavage on display.

[elmo]

Originally Posted by darththeo

You should have wrote "LOLi BOOBS"

I laughed at it myself ...
Then I thought, what did the Parents of those two young actresses think when they found out about the scene? Were they upset? Shocked? Or didn't care because they are getting tons of money.

I have to say I am shocked to see that on a show that is on ABC ... which isn't it owned by Disney now?

disney films are getting more sexuall all the time