|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you think of this picture | |||
| Pure hetroerotica! |
   
|
30 | 41.10% |
| needs some work |
  
|
31 | 42.47% |
| I don't like it. |
  
|
19 | 26.03% |
| Are you available for commissions? |
  
|
3 | 4.11% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-16-2009
|
#1 |
|
Lurker
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 29
|
The Firmness of Love (NOT SAFE FOR WORK)
A male and female werewolf embracing while transforming under the light of the full moon:
http://groups.google.com/group/poser...ICV3.jpg?hl=en This picture is for non-commercial private use only! Last edited by NightmareHero; 01-16-2009 at 06:22 PM. |
|
|
|
01-16-2009
|
#2 |
|
Modest Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,998
|
Re: The Firmness of Love (NOT SAFE FOR WORK)
You do a good job. Very solid almost comic-book style art (well, Western comics, that is).
__________________
Meh. Cranky and old. |
|
|
|
|
01-16-2009
|
#3 |
|
Process Fan
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 42
|
Re: The Firmness of Love (NOT SAFE FOR WORK)
Very very nice work!
|
|
|
|
|
01-16-2009
|
#4 |
|
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 442
|
Re: The Firmness of Love (NOT SAFE FOR WORK)
There are people who visit here from work?
The one problem I see is that the clothes lying on the ground look too "flat." They look like they're solid pieces of inflexible material, rather than fabric. |
|
|
|
|
01-16-2009
|
#5 |
|
Squirrel!
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nope
Posts: 9,649
|
Re: The Firmness of Love (NOT SAFE FOR WORK)
i liked it but the guy's pec muscles were just so big it made it look like he's got boobehs himself
kupo and for the first time ever i will say: less boobehs (on the guy) kupo |
|
|
|
|
01-16-2009
|
#6 |
|
Process Disciple
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,920
|
Re: The Firmness of Love (NOT SAFE FOR WORK)
They look like poser models with photoshop filters laid over them. Is that it, or am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
|
01-17-2009
|
#7 |
|
America Runs On DD's
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 379
|
Re: The Firmness of Love (NOT SAFE FOR WORK)
I guess the pain of transformation can very easily translate to pure pleasure if these two are into S&M.
__________________
How much is too much? Well, if I say it's too much muscle you can pretty much damn well bank on it being too much. |
|
|
|
|
01-17-2009
|
#8 | ||
|
Calling from the New Era
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,005
|
Re: The Firmness of Love (NOT SAFE FOR WORK)
Quote:
as for the pic, well, it's poser. I mean I guess it's good for poser, but poser really doesn't do anything for me. edit: Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
01-17-2009
|
#9 |
|
Bored of being an asshole
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 693
|
Re: The Firmness of Love (NOT SAFE FOR WORK)
The image was... eh... it's, as has been said, poser with a photoshop cover. Not terribly impressive or fun to look at. Also it lacked much in they way of actual transformation.
This topic title however, I find very hilarious in an ironic sort of way. I highly doubt "The Firmness of Love" could ever refer to something work safe. |
|
|
|
|
01-17-2009
|
#10 |
|
Process Fan
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 67
|
Re: The Firmness of Love (NOT SAFE FOR WORK)
hmmm yes i often visit this taboo fetish site from work
|
|
|
|
|
01-17-2009
|
#11 | |
|
Yippee-ki-yay, ma****er!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,023
|
Re: The Firmness of Love (NOT SAFE FOR WORK)
Quote:
Sadly, this is a process-goer in action. Call it a cautionary tale.
__________________
 (In my defense, they ARE my machines.) |
|
|
|
|
|
01-17-2009
|
#12 | |
|
Squirrel!
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nope
Posts: 9,649
|
Re: The Firmness of Love (NOT SAFE FOR WORK)
?
kupo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
