Stupid Creationist!

[Rachel Bronwyn]

It's not being biased when one side has verifiable scientific evidence and the other is based entirely on myth. Accepting scientific theory over fairytale is called rationality.

Originally Posted by Bozo

One side that is underrepresented in all these arguments: theistic evolution.

1. There is a designer, who
2. designs via scientific processes like evolution and the big bang.

Why not?

Because I would have to accept the notion a supernatural designer exists in order to believe this. I have no evidence of the existence of this supernatural designer. Believing in it would be comforting but, ultimately, irrational for me.

Is it possible? Sure. So is the existence of underpants gnomes. I have no evidence or personal incentive to believe in either though, therefore I tend to think not.

I don't know what if anything caused events like the creation of the universe and life or evolution. I don't claim to. I do know these things occurred though and can verify such. It doesn't involve faith to know the verifiable occurred. I am in absolutely no way a woman of faith.