![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Should/is non-process material allowed? | |||
Yes its allowed |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 28.57% |
No its not allowed |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 50.00% |
Yes its allowed but shouldnt be |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
No its not allowed but should be |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 7.14% |
Just show boobs!! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 14.29% |
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#13 |
Process Master
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 886
|
Non-process stuff belongs in General Discussion. Maybe there should be a separate place specifically for general stories and art, but they don't belong in any of the process sections.
The Process has been my favorite TF site for years because of its focus on the process (specifically, female process). It's so annoying going to a site like Transfur and seeing furry pics claiming to be TF-related. The higher the standards here, the less time we all waste looking at subpar/unrelated material that we can find plenty of elsewhere. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Slave to the Process Forum
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,781
|
Re: Is/should non-process material (be) allowed?
Quote:
Linking to non-process stuff is fine, always has been. But the rules that are in place are there to conserve server space. Everyone has access to their own uploads through the user control panel. If you care about the rules and saving the server space, you might want to weed out your own non-process file attachments. Last edited by TF-Viewer; 04-23-2010 at 04:30 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
is not a mod.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast USA
Posts: 4,188
|
Re: Is/should non-process material (be) allowed?
I believe the official stance is that if it's good enough, Lorekeep won't delete it even if there's no process or implied process. If it's crap, it's gone.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|