Kidzilla

Snowglare · 07-07-2010

I only visit the Process for sexual fetish material, but I agree with TF-Viewer. It's not inherently sexual. Most people can look at mainstream TF material, which is clearly what this is, and never imagine anyone finds it titillating. It's OK to have kids transform in a non-sexual way, and it's easy to tell the difference between sexual and non-sexual.

In other words, Pinocchio ain't kiddie porn, no matter how many of us it turned into deviants.

07-07-2010	#10
Snowglare Process Master Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 886	I only visit the Process for sexual fetish material, but I agree with TF-Viewer. It's not inherently sexual. Most people can look at mainstream TF material, which is clearly what this is, and never imagine anyone finds it titillating. It's OK to have kids transform in a non-sexual way, and it's easy to tell the difference between sexual and non-sexual. In other words, Pinocchio ain't kiddie porn, no matter how many of us it turned into deviants.