Kidzilla

[Anahki]

Originally Posted by TF-Viewer

I know you're trying really hard to make your case but it's entirely moot in this situation. That book is not pornographic. Even if it has a child transform in it, transformation is not universally sexual in nature, most of it is completely benign and harmless, such as this case. It doesn't matter what the age of the character is in transformation media when it's not depicted in a sexual way.

The reason it actually doesn't belong in this section is it's male TF, first and foremost.

And please, try to understand that not everyone here faps to each and every type of transformation that's posted. Some people actually do have a non-sexual interest in this stuff, hard to believe when this site is advertised as transformation fetish in nature, but not everything on it is porn. And that book, is certainly not child pornography so let's just let the issue die.

I subscribe you. Sorry if I've expressed myself so roughly. Well, perhaps I should have extracted the main idea here: this is not an appropriate place for child-related stuff, be sexual-oriented or not. I hope this finish off all the problems here, as I said, I try to keep this as it is, a female TF subforum. Thanks.

[LK]

It doesn't have to be sexual to arouse people.

I look at platform boots. I look at fully clothed, intricately costumed women. It could be argued it isn't sexual (for those posing in a manner not meant to stimulate), something done for fun, fashion, and showmanship. I completely agree with that. It also turns me the fuck on.

I'm very uncomfortable discussing matters involving non-sexual "transformation material" because I know how people tend to be. That's why I try to jam as much "they're adults" and "sex is gonna happen" into my works (emphasis on MY) whenever I can. I wouldn't mind writing stories taking place in a high school but because of the audience, the subject matter, and societal mores, it's a no go.

Not so much a restriction in Japan seems like. But, there are two sides to every matter, each with their valid points.

It's a male TF on the cover. It's got good rippage and TF growth. It's not depicted in a sexual manner. Let's leave it at that. Each item will be judged on a case-by-case basis but I am not in advocacy of kiddy TF. Sorry Chica.

[Prof_Sai]

Originally Posted by Drachen

the "only female" restriction imply a lot of sexual context to something that might not be sexual at first blush.

Because of course, females automatically mean sex.

(Just teasing, I know what you meant.)

[Drachen]

I don't think this discussion is worth continuing at this point but...

Originally Posted by Prof_Sai

Because of course, females automatically mean sex.

(Just teasing, I know what you meant.)

Had I said only that, I would agree. I didn't. You clipped out the part about this being called a "fetish" forum. So yes, it does automatically mean sexual attraction.