Why do film makers not do any homework on practical makeup or social structure

[bcislandguy]

Some movies seem to have a better grasp on the idea, stuff like skinwalkers, wolves, Bitten Tv series putting actual time into developing the characters, even that old movie Wolf with jack nicholson was good

[bcislandguy]

But as Blackjack said my point was its not that we have to nail down a perfect werewolf form as a standard, have a movie with a full wolf, the wolfman or something like wolfsbayne from the comics , we each have our own idea what a werewolf is. But its that the artists creating the monster puts some effort into it. Like that Wolves movie that came out like a year or two ago did the manwolf look with both female and male characters and they looked lupine but also with human traits and it worked, Bitten or Blood and Chocolate (apart from the wavy mist tf into the wolf) had full wolves and the characters as humans had a wolfish/predatory way of thinking than lended itself to the story. But take a movie like the underworld series, there are no female werewolves cause the director wants all the women to be beautiful so all the werewolves are these greasy unkempt men most with about 75IQ points and the vampires are sexy women and a few filler men. The werewolves in the film are just underdeveloped bullet magnets for Seline