![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Who Would You Want To Watch Shrink
Don't know if anyone has suggested Valerie and Betty from LOTG, so I will.
Final size around five to six inches. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Process Master
Join Date: May 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 607
|
Re: Who Would You Want To Watch Shrink
Quote:
Nice picture.
__________________
"Intensify the forward batteries. I don't want anything to get through…Intensify forward firepower!" Admiral Firmus Piett |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Who Would You Want To Watch Shrink
You must try and catch the reruns. They crop up fairly regularly on the Freeview channels over here. It's pretty mild stuff and the effects are what you'd expect from the 1960's, but good fun.
Quote:
It reminds me of a couple of my appearances as a sw in a short dress, where I got caught out with the camera flash (by my not so professional photographer partner!). Not sure they'd fit the context of the thread though. Thank you. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Process Master
Join Date: May 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 607
|
Re: Who Would You Want To Watch Shrink
Quote:
I don't think so. Not in this context. That doesn't sound right. Photographers should be professional.
__________________
"Intensify the forward batteries. I don't want anything to get through…Intensify forward firepower!" Admiral Firmus Piett |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Who Would You Want To Watch Shrink
I agree, professional photographers should be professional. Trouble is I never used a professional, just my other half. So you get what you pay for (or don't pay for), haha!
Last edited by sally g; 08-11-2018 at 07:21 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|