![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 20
|
Re: Why BE content is hard.
Why the "lol"? I think Madz work is very good. The Giga Pill III is to my liking. She's working with what she has. My only bitch is that I hate loyal fans. Too many subs out there. If I sub to everything I will go broke.
Subing and paying for a clip is a lot to ask for. I'm more of a fan of Clip4sale and TaylorMadeClip. I only pay for what I want. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 337
|
Re: Why BE content is hard.
Quote:
I've been sad about the lack of content as of late, and I figured it was from all the creators aging out and finding new things to occupy their time. Then I learned that as a collective audience, we are not model. The BE community is cheap and (to my fears) most likely toxic. I've seen a few content creators come in hard and then disappear. I have no idea how to fix this or if I am even correct. I've seen some Patreon pages for BE games doing very, VERY well. But still the collective community is just meh...
__________________
If you don't have money? TOUGH SHIT! If you don't have the cash, that's your problem. -ClickMe https://blakegordon.deviantart.com/a...TWBE-684396622 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
BE fan :3
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 90
|
Re: Why BE content is hard.
Quote:
However her content has always been/is extremely lazy and phoned in. Her and her whole "crew" all make similar content and then nuke/move onto the next kink once the BE well dries up. She has already hinted at this since other models are now starting to surpass her in content. Edit: And yes I am aware that is how every dime a dozen e-girl operates...but still. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 20
|
Re: Why BE content is hard.
I feel where both of you are coming from. This topic is interesting because I have wondered if the community burns out creators. There is so little out that when a good one appears I bet they get swarmed, plus everyone’s a critic.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Frequent Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 139
|
Re: Why BE content is hard.
Problem is, it isn't hard. Great expansion stories are out there. Those without the means, write, those with the means don't seem to read.
As for the community, I haven't seen much that's toxic. It's just crickets. That said, I was trying to think of a story that could be reasonably pulled off, and I think Steve Palmer's excellent "Blind Date" could be adapted with incredibly ease. It's mostly just two characters and the sizes fall in the range of the breast plates that so many are experimenting with.
__________________
https://www.deviantart.com/writclovis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Process Fan
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 35
|
Re: Why BE content is hard.
I believe a Rotten Tomatoes rating/linking system is sorely needed. One that allows for seasoned creators and fans alike to both input a rating to content submitted into the system. Why put all the effort in if your content leaves the ‘what’s new’ page a few weeks later?
I’ve mentioned that a few times but know FA about how to go about building out such a database. It should have the ability to have tags on it like Overflowing Bra’s site and allow ‘accredited’ reviewers place ratings of 1 to 100 on the clips, along with notes about why they left that review. Same for the fans postings. This would have to be a labour of love initially with volunteers working to build out the needed bits (web, art, etc), but with an agreement of ownership in the hopes that if it performs well, the folks who helped build it out get rewarded. Ad banners and possibly ‘promoted’ videos would make up the bulk of the initial revenue to keep the lights on. The idea of having a master list of all BE clips, comics and other content out there in one key location would help demonstrate to those who create content that their hard work can be recognized and cement a place in the top tiers of content. And that in turn gives something for the next generation to shoot to top. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|